Predicting potential to benefit from an iron intervention: a randomized controlled trial of double-fortified salt in female Indian tea pluckers
- PMID: 31342886
- PMCID: PMC6891141
- DOI: 10.1017/S1368980019001800
Predicting potential to benefit from an iron intervention: a randomized controlled trial of double-fortified salt in female Indian tea pluckers
Abstract
Objective: The present study examines characteristics of those who benefited from a dietary Fe intervention comprised of salt double-fortified with iodine and Fe (DFS).
Design: Data from a randomized controlled trial were analysed to identify predictors of improved Fe status and resolution of Fe deficiency (serum ferritin (sFt) < 12 μg/l) and low body Fe (body Fe (BI) < 0·0 mg/kg) using non-parametric estimations and binomial regression models.
Setting: A tea estate in West Bengal, India.
Participants: Female tea pluckers, aged 18-55 years.
Results: Consuming DFS significantly (P = 0·01) predicted resolution of Fe deficiency (relative risk (RR) = 2·31) and of low BI (RR = 2·78) compared with consuming iodized salt. Baseline sFt (β = -0·32 (se 0·03), P < 0·001) and treatment group (β = 0·13 (se 0·03), P < 0·001) significantly predicted change in sFt. The interaction of baseline BI with treatment group (β = -0·11 (se 0·06), P = 0·08) predicted the change in BI. DFS did not significantly predict change in Hb and marginally predicted resolution of anaemia (Hb < 120 g/l).
Conclusions: Baseline Fe status, as assessed by sFt and BI, and consumption of DFS predict change in Fe status and resolution of Fe deficiency and low BI. Anaemia prevalence and Hb level, although simple and inexpensive to measure, may not be adequate to predict resolution of Fe deficiency in response to an intervention of DFS in similar populations with high prevalence of Fe deficiency and multiple nutritional causes of anaemia. These findings will guide appropriate targeting of future interventions.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01032005.
Keywords: Anaemia; Dietary interventions; Fortified foods; Iron deficiency; Targeting interventions.
Figures
, iodized salt;
, double-fortified salt) and baseline quartile of iron status. Boxplots indicate the lower quartile, median and upper quartile, and whiskers indicate minimum and maximum values; P values indicate significance of differences between treatment groups (sFt, serum ferritin; BI, estimated total body iron)References
-
- Stoltzfus RJ (2003) Iron deficiency: global prevalence and consequences. Food Nutr Bull 24, 4 Suppl., S99–S103. - PubMed
-
- Haas JD & Brownlie T (2001) Iron deficiency and reduced work capacity: a critical review of the research to determine a causal relationship. J Nutr 131, 2S-2, 676S–690S. - PubMed
-
- Pasricha S-R, Low M, Thompson J et al.. (2014) Iron supplementation benefits physical performance in women of reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr 144, 906–914. - PubMed
-
- Beard JL & Connor JR (2003) Iron status and neural functioning. Annu Rev Nutr 23, 41–58. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
