Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 24;21(7):e13322.
doi: 10.2196/13322.

Use of Social Robots in Mental Health and Well-Being Research: Systematic Review

Arielle Aj Scoglio  1 , Erin D Reilly  1 , Jay A Gorman  1 , Charles E Drebing  1
Affiliations

Use of Social Robots in Mental Health and Well-Being Research: Systematic Review

Arielle Aj Scoglio et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Technology-assisted clinical interventions are increasingly common in the health care field, often with the proposed aim to improve access to and cost-effectiveness of care. Current technology platforms delivering interventions are largely mobile apps and online websites, although efforts have been made to create more personalized and embodied technology experiences. To extend and improve on these platforms, the field of robotics has been increasingly included in conversations of how to deliver technology-assisted, interactive, and responsive mental health and psychological well-being interventions. Socially assistive robots (SARs) are robotic technology platforms with audio, visual, and movement capabilities that are being developed to interact with individuals socially while also assisting them with management of their physical and psychological well-being. However, little is known about the empirical evidence or utility of using SARs in mental health interventions.

Objective: The review synthesizes and describes the nascent empirical literature of SARs in mental health research and identifies strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement in future research and practice.

Methods: Searches in Medline, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PubMed, and IEEE Xplore yielded 12 studies included in the final review after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Abstract and full-text reviews were conducted by two authors independently.

Results: This systematic review of the literature found 5 distinct SARs used in research to investigate the potential for this technology to address mental health and psychological well-being outcomes. Research on mental health applications of SARs focuses largely on elderly dementia patients and relies on usability pilot data with methodological limitations.

Conclusions: The current SARs research in mental health use is limited in generalizability, scope, and measurement of psychological outcomes. Opportunities for expansion of research in this area include diversifying populations studied, SARs used, clinical applications, measures used, and settings for those applications.

Keywords: interventions; mental health; social robotics; socially assistive robots.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting of Systematic Reviews Search and Review diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Social robots used in reviewed articles: (a) Paro, AIST [41]; (b) Haptic Creature [48], photo by Martin Dee; (c) NAO, Aldebaran Robotics; (d) Betty [45]; and (e) CRECA [43].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lawrence D, Kisely S. Inequalities in healthcare provision for people with severe mental illness. J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Nov;24(4 Suppl):61–68. doi: 10.1177/1359786810382058. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/20923921 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saxena S, Thornicroft G, Knapp M, Whiteford H. Resources for mental health: scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency. Lancet. 2007 Sep;370(9590):878–889. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61239-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goddard M, Smith P. Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK. Soc Sci Med. 2001 Nov;53(9):1149–1162. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00415-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. West A, Weeks WB. Physical and mental health and access to care among nonmetropolitan veterans health administration patients younger than 65 years. J Rural Health. 2006 Jan;22(1):9–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00014.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dahl T, Boulos M. Robots in health and social care: a complementary technology to home care and telehealthcare? Robotics. 2013 Dec 30;3(1):1–21. doi: 10.3390/robotics3010001. - DOI

Publication types