Clinical Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine: A Systematic Review of Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trials in Orthopaedic Surgery
- PMID: 31343508
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00192
Clinical Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine: A Systematic Review of Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trials in Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract
Background: There has been a surge in interest with regard to the utility of liposomal bupivacaine as part of a perioperative pain management protocol. The current study was proposed to critically assess the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine as a local anesthetic for pain relief following orthopaedic procedures.
Methods: A systematic review of prospective, randomized trials involving liposomal bupivacaine was performed using searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The primary outcomes of interest included postoperative subjective pain scores and narcotic consumption. The length of stay and postoperative mobility were reviewed as secondary outcomes.
Results: Twenty-seven studies met inclusion criteria and were included for review. Twelve of 17 studies concluded that periarticular or local infiltrative liposomal bupivacaine offered no additive benefit compared with other local anesthetic injections. Peripheral nerve blocks without liposomal bupivacaine conferred more optimal pain relief and decreased narcotic consumption in the immediate postoperative period when compared with liposomal bupivacaine, with no differences thereafter. Twelve studies listed a conflict of interest related to the drug manufacturer (Pacira Pharmaceuticals). Eight of these studies (67%) demonstrated clinical superiority of liposomal bupivacaine when compared with the study control. In the 15 studies that did not show a conflict of interest, only 1 study (7%) demonstrated therapeutic superiority with use of periarticular liposomal bupivacaine when compared with a historical cohort that received no local or regional anesthesia.
Conclusions: Current prospective, randomized controlled trials in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery fail to support the routine use of liposomal bupivacaine compared with other local injectable analgesics, particularly in the setting of knee replacement surgery. We were unable to find consistent support for the potential of superior pain relief and narcotic use reduction with the use of liposomal bupivacaine.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
References
-
- Kuang MJ, Du Y, Ma JX, He W, Fu L, Ma XL. The efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine using periarticular injection in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1395-402. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
-
- Zhang X, Yang Q, Zhang Z. The efficiency and safety of local liposomal bupivacaine infiltration for pain control in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(49):e8433.
-
- Yu ZX, Yang ZZ, Yao LL. Effectiveness of liposome bupivacaine for postoperative pain control in total knee arthroplasty: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0171.
-
- Cao X, Pan F. Comparison of liposomal bupivacaine infiltration versus interscalene nerve block for pain control in total shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized control trails. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(39):e8079.
-
- Okoroha KR, Keller RA, Marshall NE, Jung EK, Mehran N, Owashi E, Moutzouros V. Liposomal bupivacaine versus femoral nerve block for pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial. Arthroscopy. 2016 Sep;32(9):1838-45. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
