Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May;51(5):1310-1324.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.26878. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

Artificial intelligence in the interpretation of breast cancer on MRI

Affiliations
Review

Artificial intelligence in the interpretation of breast cancer on MRI

Deepa Sheth et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 May.

Abstract

Advances in both imaging and computers have led to the rise in the potential use of artificial intelligence (AI) in various tasks in breast imaging, going beyond the current use in computer-aided detection to include diagnosis, prognosis, response to therapy, and risk assessment. The automated capabilities of AI offer the potential to enhance the diagnostic expertise of clinicians, including accurate demarcation of tumor volume, extraction of characteristic cancer phenotypes, translation of tumoral phenotype features to clinical genotype implications, and risk prediction. The combination of image-specific findings with the underlying genomic, pathologic, and clinical features is becoming of increasing value in breast cancer. The concurrent emergence of newer imaging techniques has provided radiologists with greater diagnostic tools and image datasets to analyze and interpret. Integrating an AI-based workflow within breast imaging enables the integration of multiple data streams into powerful multidisciplinary applications that may lead the path to personalized patient-specific medicine. In this article we describe the goals of AI in breast cancer imaging, in particular MRI, and review the literature as it relates to the current application, potential, and limitations in breast cancer. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1310-1324.

Keywords: MRI; artificial intelligence; breast imaging; computer-aided diagnosis; deep learning; machine learning; radiomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Cancer Society website. Cancer facts and figures 2016. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts...
    1. National Cancer Institute website. SEER stat fact sheets: Female breast cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html
    1. Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HH, Smith RA, Duffy SW. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 2003;361:1405-1410.
    1. Feig S. Cost-effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening. Radiol Clin North Am 2010;48:879-891.
    1. Nelson HD, O'Meara ES, Kerlikowske K, Balch S, Miglioretti D. Factors associated with rates of false-positive and false-negative results from digital mammography screening: An analysis of registry data. Ann Intern Med 2016;164:226-235

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources