Decision-making around resuscitation of extremely preterm infants in the Philippines: A consensus guideline
- PMID: 31343809
- PMCID: PMC6771675
- DOI: 10.1111/jpc.14552
Decision-making around resuscitation of extremely preterm infants in the Philippines: A consensus guideline
Abstract
While the vast majority of preterm births globally occur in low- and middle-income countries, existing published guidelines relating to the decision-making and resuscitation of extremely preterm infants (EPIs) largely focus on high-income countries. In 2018-2019, a working group of the Philippine Society of Newborn Medicine aimed to develop the first national guideline relating to the care of EPIs. The working group reviewed data on the outcomes of EPIs in the Philippines, surveyed paediatricians and neonatologists in the Philippines about current practice and held a consensus workshop. This paper describes the guideline development process and presents a summary of the guidelines. The national guidelines endorse consistency in decision-making. Health professionals should take into consideration the views and wishes of the infant's parents and the availability of resources to treat the newborn infant. Active management would be appropriate to provide for potentially viable preterm infants at moderate to high risk of poor outcomes, where parents have expressed their wish for this management (and where there are resources available to provide this treatment). For such infants, where parents have expressed their wish to withhold active management, palliative management would also be appropriate to provide. The guideline endorses a grey zone for neonatal resuscitation from approximately 24 to 28 weeks' gestation in the Philippines, reflecting the context for resuscitation in low- and middle-income countries. Disparities in resource availability are themselves an ethical concern for neonatologists and should be a stimulus for advocacy and improvements in health-care delivery.
Keywords: Philippines; clinical decision-making; consensus development conference; infant, extremely premature; practice guideline; resuscitation.
© 2019 The Authors Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Paediatrics and Child Health Division (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians).
Figures
), ≤25 weeks; (
), 26 weeks; (
), 27 weeks; (
), 28 weeks; (
), 29 weeks; (
), 30 weeks; (
), 31 weeks; (
), 32 weeks.
), Never; (
), rarely; (
), sometimes; (
), often; (
), always. (Reproduced from Hayden et al.,24 with permission).
References
-
- Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S et al Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: An updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet 2012; 379: 2151–61. - PubMed
-
- Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008; 371: 261–9. - PubMed
-
- Pignotti MS, Donzelli G. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability: An international comparison of practical guidelines for the treatment of extremely preterm births. Pediatrics 2008; 121: e193. - PubMed
-
- Guillén Ú, Weiss EM, Munson D et al Guidelines for the management of extremely premature deliveries: A systematic review. Pediatrics 2015; 136: 343–50. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
