Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 25;19(1):279.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1706-8.

The role of WhatsApp® in medical education; a scoping review and instructional design model

E Coleman  1 , E O'Connor  2
Affiliations

The role of WhatsApp® in medical education; a scoping review and instructional design model

E Coleman et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Technological advances have driven huge change in educational practices though concerns exist about a lack of evidence informing this change, in particular with social media-based medical education activities. The purpose of this study was to conduct a scoping review of WhatsApp use in medical education, narratively describing how it has been used and evaluated, and the theoretical considerations in relevant articles.

Methods: A modified 5-stage scoping review model was used. We performed 2 searches from February 2009 to February 2019 in EBSCO, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, Medline PubMed and Google Scholar) using the term "WhatsApp" in all search fields. A 3-stage process for study selection was performed. Only original articles in English presenting original data about WhatsApp in medical education were included. The Kirkpatrick model of training evaluation was used to describe learning outcomes in included studies.

Results: Twenty-three articles were selected for review. Three strategies for WhatsApp use were apparent; primarily educational use with a pre-defined curriculum (n = 5), primarily educational use without a curriculum (n = 11), and primarily non-educational use (n = 7). Most of the educational studies used an online moderator and were in a local hospital or university department. Studies not primarily educational were national or international and seldom included an online moderator. All 5 studies with a pre-defined curriculum reported Kirkpatrick level 2 learner knowledge outcomes. A majority of the remaining studies only reported Kirkpatrick level 1 learner attitudes. Seven studies with 647 participants reported an improvement in learners' knowledge following WhatsApp learning, though methodological weaknesses were apparent. Evidence for underlying learning theory considerations were scant throughout the studies.

Conclusions: WhatsApp is popular and convenient in medical education. Current published literature suggests it may also be effective as a medical learning tool. By combining the 3 strategies for WhatsApp use and the exploration-enactment-assessment integrated learning design framework, we propose an instant messenger design model for medical education. This may address the need for theory-driven instructional design in social media learning. Further research would clarify the role of WhatsApp and our design model in this area.

Keywords: Blended learning; Instant messenger applications; Learning theory; Social media learning; eLearning; mLearning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study search strategy and reasons for study exclusions
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proposed design model of instant messenger learning in medical education. Adapted from Dabbagh [50]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Maudsley G, Taylor D, Allam O, Garner J, Calinici T, Linkman K. A best evidence medical education (BEME) systematic review of: what works best for health professions students using mobile (hand-held) devices for educational support on clinical placements? BEME guide no. 52. Med Teach. 2019;41(2):125–140. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1508829. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chase TJG, Julius A, Chandan JS, Powell E, Hall CS, Phillips BL, Burnett R, Gill D, Fernando B. Mobile learning in medicine: an evaluation of attitudes and behaviours of medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1264-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boruff JT, Storie D. Mobile devices in medicine: a survey of how medical students, residents, and faculty use smartphones and other mobile devices to find information. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014;102(1):22–30. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.1.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bullock A, Webb K. Technology in postgraduate medical education: a dynamic influence on learning? Postgrad Med J. 2015;91(1081):646–650. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132809. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. AlFaris E, Irfan F, Ponnamperuma G, Jamal A, Van der Vleuten C, Al Maflehi N, Al-Qeas S, Alenezi A, Alrowaished M, Alsalman R, Ahmed AMA. The pattern of social media use and its association with academic performance among medical students. Med Teach. 2018;40(S1):S77–S82. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1465536. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources