Demographics, management and outcome of females and males with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the LUNG SAFE prospective cohort study
- PMID: 31346004
- DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00609-2019
Demographics, management and outcome of females and males with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the LUNG SAFE prospective cohort study
Abstract
Rationale: We wished to determine the influence of sex on the management and outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients in the Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE).
Methods: We assessed the effect of sex on mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in patients with ARDS who underwent IMV, adjusting for plausible clinical and geographic confounders.
Findings: Of 2377 patients with ARDS, 905 (38%) were female and 1472 (62%) were male. There were no sex differences in clinician recognition of ARDS or critical illness severity profile. Females received higher tidal volumes (8.2±2.1 versus 7.2±1.6 mL·kg-1; p<0.0001) and higher plateau and driving pressures compared with males. Lower tidal volume ventilation was received by 50% of females compared with 74% of males (p<0.0001). In shorter patients (height ≤1.69 m), females were significantly less likely to receive lower tidal volumes. Surviving females had a shorter duration of IMV and reduced length of stay compared with males. Overall hospital mortality was similar in females (40.2%) versus males (40.2%). However, female sex was associated with higher mortality in patients with severe confirmed ARDS (OR for sex (male versus female) 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.83).
Conclusions: Shorter females with ARDS are less likely to receive lower tidal volume ventilation, while females with severe confirmed ARDS have a higher mortality risk. These data highlight the need for better ventilatory management in females to improve their outcomes from ARDS.
Copyright ©ERS 2019.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: B.A. McNicholas has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Madotto has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Pham has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Rezoagli has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C.H. Masterson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Horie has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Bellani reports grants and personal fees from Draeger Medical, personal fees from Hamilton, Getinge and Dimar SRL, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L. Brochard reports grants from Covidien, grants and nonfinancial support from Fisher Paykel, Air Liquide and General Electric, nonfinancial support from Philips and Sentec, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J.G. Laffey has nothing to disclose.
Comment in
-
Is gender inequity in ventilator management a "women's issue"?Eur Respir J. 2019 Oct 17;54(4):1901588. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01588-2019. Print 2019 Oct. Eur Respir J. 2019. PMID: 31624130 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources