Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;144(2):159e-166e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005794.

Increases in Postmastectomy Reconstruction in New York State Are Not Related to Changes in State Law

Jessica C Gooch  1 , Amber Guth  1 , Jie Yang  1 , Chencan Zhu  1 , Jihye Park  1 , Dana Telem  1 , Duc Bui  1 , Brian O'Hea  1 , Sami Khan  1
Affiliations

Increases in Postmastectomy Reconstruction in New York State Are Not Related to Changes in State Law

Jessica C Gooch et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Postmastectomy reconstruction remains underused. In 2011, new legislation in New York State mandated discussion of reconstructive options before mastectomy. This study assesses the impact of this policy on immediate breast reconstruction rates.

Methods: The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried to identify women undergoing mastectomy from January of 2005 to October of 2015 and follow them for at least 1 year postoperatively to determine the incidence and timing of reconstruction. Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were collected. Chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression were used to compare periods before (2005 to 2010) and after (2011 to 2015) the legislative change.

Results: Of 52,837 records, there were 24,340 patients (46 percent) who underwent immediate breast reconstruction. The incidence of immediate breast reconstruction increased over the study period, most significantly in 2008 to 2009. Rates of immediate breast reconstruction continued to increase, although at a slower rate, after 2011 compared with before 2011 across all subgroups. Both implant and autologous reconstructive techniques increased over time. Implant-based reconstruction increased steadily, whereas autologous reconstruction increased most significantly between 2008 and 2009.

Conclusions: Despite an overall increase in immediate breast reconstruction, there was an overall lack of effect on post-2011 reconstructive rates attributable to the legislative changes. Reconstructive rates have increased significantly in New York State over the past decade, and these changes appear to be largely independent of the 2011 New York State Breast Reconstruction Act. There are likely nonlegislative drivers of breast reconstruction use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Tseng JF, Kronowitz SJ, Sun CC, et al. The effect of ethnicity on immediate reconstruction rates after mastectomy for breast cancer. Cancer 2004;101:1514–1523.
    1. Sisco M, Du H, Warner JP, Howard MA, Winchester DP, Yao K. Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the national cancer data base. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:658–666; discussion 666.
    1. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Pusic AL, et al. The influence of sociodemographic factors and hospital characteristics on the method of breast reconstruction, including microsurgery: A U.S. population-based study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1071–1079.
    1. Kruper L, Holt A, Xu XX, et al. Disparities in reconstruction rates after mastectomy: Patterns of care and factors associated with the use of breast reconstruction in Southern California. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2158–2165.
    1. Giladi AM, Aliu O, Chung KC. The effect of medicaid expansion in New York State on use of subspecialty surgical procedures by medicaid beneficiaries and the uninsured. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:889–897.

MeSH terms