Evaluation of machine learning methods with Fourier Transform features for classifying ovarian tumors based on ultrasound images
- PMID: 31348783
- PMCID: PMC6660116
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219388
Evaluation of machine learning methods with Fourier Transform features for classifying ovarian tumors based on ultrasound images
Abstract
Introduction: Ovarian tumors are the most common diagnostic challenge for gynecologists and ultrasound examination has become the main technique for assessment of ovarian pathology and for preoperative distinction between malignant and benign ovarian tumors. However, ultrasonography is highly examiner-dependent and there may be an important variability between two different specialists when examining the same case. The objective of this work is the evaluation of different well-known Machine Learning (ML) systems to perform the automatic categorization of ovarian tumors from ultrasound images.
Methods: We have used a real patient database whose input features have been extracted from 348 images, from the IOTA tumor images database, holding together with the class labels of the images. For each patient case and ultrasound image, its input features have been previously extracted using Fourier descriptors computed on the Region Of Interest (ROI). Then, four ML techniques are considered for performing the classification stage: K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Linear Discriminant (LD), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM).
Results: According to our obtained results, the KNN classifier provides inaccurate predictions (less than 60% of accuracy) independently of the size of the local approximation, whereas the classifiers based on LD, SVM and ELM are robust in this biomedical classification (more than 85% of accuracy).
Conclusions: ML methods can be efficiently used for developing the classification stage in computer-aided diagnosis systems of ovarian tumor from ultrasound images. These approaches are able to provide automatic classification with a high rate of accuracy. Future work should aim at enhancing the classifier design using ensemble techniques. Another ongoing work is to exploit different kind of features extracted from ultrasound images.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Berek J.S. Berek & Novak’s Gynecology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2015.
-
- Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer. Incidencia del cáncer de ovario. url=https://www.aecc.es/sobreelcancer/cancerporlocalizacion/cancerdeovario/p...
-
- Roldán F. Cáncer de ovario. Boletín Oncológico, 1998, vol. 8, no 1, http://www.boloncol.com/boletin-8/cancer-de-ovario.html
-
- Meys EMJ, Kaijser J, Kruitwagen RFPM, Slangen BFM, Van Calster B, Aertgeerts B, et al. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Cancer. Elsevier 2016. vol. 58, 17–29. 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.01.007 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yazbek J, Ameye L, Testa AC, Valentin L, Timmerman D, Holland TK, et al. Confidence of expert ultrasound operators in making a diagnosis of adnexal tumor: effect on diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wiley Online Library 2010, vol. 35, no 1, 89–93. 10.1002/uog.7335 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
