Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 26;18(1):64.
doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0437-2.

Advance care planning with patients on hemodialysis: an implementation study

Sarah L Goff  1   2 , Mark L Unruh  3 , Jamie Klingensmith  4 , Nwamaka D Eneanya  5   6 , Casey Garvey  7 , Michael J Germain  4 , Lewis M Cohen  4
Affiliations

Advance care planning with patients on hemodialysis: an implementation study

Sarah L Goff et al. BMC Palliat Care. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on hemodialysis have limited life expectancy, yet their palliative care needs often go unmet. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators for implementation of "Shared Decision Making and Renal Supportive Care" (SDM-RSC), an intervention to improve advance care planning (ACP) for patients with ESKD on hemodialysis.

Methods: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was the organizing framework for this study. CFIR is a theory-based implementation framework consisting of five domains (Intervention Characteristics, Inner Setting, Outer Setting, Characteristics of Individuals, and Process), each of which has associated constructs. Potential barriers and facilitators to implementation of the SDM-RSC intervention were identified through observation of study procedures, surveys of social workers nephrologists, study participants, and family members, and assessment of intervention fidelity.

Results: Twenty-nine nephrologists and 24 social workers, representing 18 outpatient dialysis units in Massachusetts (n = 10) and New Mexico (n = 8), were trained to conduct SDM-RSC intervention sessions. A total of 102 of 125 patient enrolled in the study received the intervention; 40 had family members present. Potential barriers and facilitators to implementation of the SDM-RSC intervention were identified in each of the five CFIR domains. Barriers included complexity of the intervention; challenges to meeting with patients on non-dialysis days; difficulties scheduling intervention sessions due to nephrologists' and social workers' caseloads; perceived need for local policy change regarding ACP; perceived need for additional ACP training for social workers and nephrologists; and lack of endorsement of the intervention by some staff members. Facilitators included: training for social workers, national dialysis chain leadership engagement and the institution of social worker/nephrologist clinic champions.

Conclusions: ACP for patients on hemodialysis can have a positive impact on end-of-life outcomes for patients and their families but does not take place routinely. The barriers to effective implementation of interventions to improve ACP identified in this study might be addressed by: adapting the intervention for local contexts with input from clinicians, dialysis staff, patients and families; providing nephrologists and social workers additional training prior to delivering the intervention; and developing policy that routinizes ACP for hemodialysis patients.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02405312. Registered 04/01/2015.

Keywords: Advance care planning; End-of-life; Hemodialysis; Implementation; Intervention; Shared decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. United States Renal Data System . USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2018. p. 2018.
    1. Breast Cancer: Statistics [Internet]. Cancer.Net. 2012 [cited 2018 Jan 24]. Available from: https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/breast-cancer/statistics.
    1. Prostate Cancer: Statistics [Internet]. Cancer.Net. 2012 [cited 2018 Jan 24]. Available from: https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/prostate-cancer/statistics.
    1. Yarlas AS, White MK, Yang M, Saris-Baglama RN, Bech PG, Christensen T. Measuring the health status burden in hemodialysis patients using the SF-36® health survey. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2011;20(3):383–389. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9764-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Culp S, Lupu D, Arenella C, Armistead N, Moss AH. Unmet supportive care needs in U.S. Dialysis centers and lack of knowledge of available resources to address them. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2016;51(4):756–761.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.11.017. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data