Genome editing, Goldilocks and polygenic risk scores
- PMID: 31350357
- DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105713
Genome editing, Goldilocks and polygenic risk scores
Keywords: CRISPR; Ethics; enhancement; gene editing; gene therapy/transfer.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment on
-
Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report.J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):514-523. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105084. Epub 2019 Jan 24. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30679191 Free PMC article.
-
The moral argument for heritable genome editing requires an inappropriately deterministic view of genetics.J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):526-527. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105390. Epub 2019 Mar 12. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30862707
-
Commentary on 'Moral reasons to edit the human genome': this is not the moral imperative we are looking for.J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):528-529. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105316. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31455694 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources