Prospective observational study to evaluate the persistence of treatment with denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors in routine clinical practice: final analysis
- PMID: 31350601
- PMCID: PMC7036060
- DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04988-7
Prospective observational study to evaluate the persistence of treatment with denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors in routine clinical practice: final analysis
Abstract
Purpose: In the integrated analysis of phase III head-to-head trials in patients with advanced solid tumors, denosumab demonstrated superiority over zoledronic acid in preventing skeletal-related events (SREs). Regular and continued drug use (persistence) is a precondition of clinical efficacy; persistence in real-life is yet undetermined for denosumab.
Methods: This was a single-arm, prospective, observational, non-interventional study in 598 patients with bone metastases from breast, prostate, lung, or other solid tumors treated with denosumab every four weeks in real-world clinical practice in Austria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, and Bulgaria. Persistence was defined as denosumab administration at ≤ 35-day intervals over 24 or 48 weeks, respectively.
Results: Previous SREs were found in 10.9% of patients. 62.6% were persistent over 24 weeks and 40.1% over 48 weeks. The Kaplan-Meier median (95% CI) time to non-persistence was 274.0 days (232.0, 316.0). The most frequent reason for non-persistence was delayed administration. There was a trend towards weaker analgesics over time, with approximately 60% of patients not requiring any analgesics. Serum calcium remained within the normal range throughout the study. Adjudicated osteonecrosis of the jaw was documented in three patients with an incidence per patient-year (95% CI) of 0.012 (0.004, 0.029).
Conclusions: Most patients received denosumab regularly once every four weeks over 24 weeks of treatment. Non-persistence was mainly due to delayed administration. The incidence of adverse drug reactions, especially of osteonecrosis of the jaw, was in line with expectations from previous studies.
Keywords: Bone metastases; Denosumab; Observational study; Persistence; Solid tumors.
Conflict of interest statement
Ferdinand Haslbauer, Martin Safanda, Antoaneta Tomova, Zoltán Bajory, Miriam Porubska, and Dmitry Kalinin have no conflicts of interest to declare. Andreas Petzer declares to hold a non-remunerative position of influence as advisory board member of Amgen and has received speaker honoraria of Amgen. Richard Greil has received research grants from Celgene, Merck, Roche, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen and BMS, and consulting fees from Celgene, Roche, BMS, Takeda, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. Christine Jaeger, Katja Bjorklof, and Daniela Niepel are employees of Amgen and hold Amgen stock.
Figures






References
-
- Coleman RE, Brown JE. Monitoring response to treatment—the role of biochemical markers. In: Jasmin C, Coleman RE, Coia LR, Capanna R, Saillant G, editors. Textbook of bone metastases. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2005.
-
- Vogel CL, Yanagihara RH, Wood AJ, Schnell FM, Henderson C, Kaplan BH, Purdy MH, Orlowski R, Decker JL, Lacerna L, Hohneker JA. Safety and pain palliation of zoledronic acid in patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer, or multiple myeloma who previously received bisphosphonate therapy. Oncologist. 2004;9:687–695. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-6-687. - DOI - PubMed
-
- European Medicines Agency . Book Xgeva summary of product characteristics. City: European Medicines Agency; 2018. Xgeva summary of product characteristics.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical