Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct;38(10):2377-2384.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02882-9. Epub 2019 Jul 27.

Current use of telehealth in urology: a review

Peris Castaneda  1 , Chad Ellimoottil  2
Affiliations
Review

Current use of telehealth in urology: a review

Peris Castaneda et al. World J Urol. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Applications of telehealth have been growing in popularity. However, there is little information on how telehealth is being used in Urology. In this review, we examine current applications of telehealth in urological practices as well as barriers to implementation.

Methods: A review was conducted of original research within the past 10 years describing telehealth applications in urology. Articles on telehealth as applied to other specialties were reviewed for discussion on real or perceived barriers to implementation.

Results: Twenty-four articles met the inclusion criteria. The most common application of telehealth was using a video visit to assess or follow-up with patients. The second most commonly described applications of telehealth were telementorship, or the use of telehealth technology to help train providers, and telemedicine used in diagnostics. Studies consistently stated the effectiveness of the telehealth applications and the high level of patient and provider satisfaction.

Conclusions: Telehealth is sparingly used in urology. Barriers to implementation include technological literacy, reimbursement uncertainties, and resistance to change in workflow. When used, telehealth technologies are shown to be safe, effective, and satisfactory for patients and providers. Further investigation is necessary to determine the efficacy of telehealth applications.

Keywords: Health communication; Patient-centered care; Telehealth; Telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine (2012) The evolution of telehealth: where have we been and where are we going?. National Academies, New York
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Evaluating Clinical Applications of Telemedicine, Field MJ (1996) Evolution and current applications of telemedicine. National Academies, New York. https://doi.org/10.17226/5296 - DOI
    1. Powell RE, Stone D, Hollander JE (2018) Patient and health system experience with implementation of an enterprise-wide telehealth scheduled video visit program: mixed-methods study. JMIR Med Inform 6(1):e10. https://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.8479 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Polinski JM, Barker T, Gagliano N et al (2016) Patients’ satisfaction with and preference for telehealth visits. J Gen Intern Med 31(3):269–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3489-x - DOI
    1. Adler-Milstein J, Kvedar J, Bates DW (2014) Telehealth among US hospitals: several factors, including state reimbursement and licensure policies, influence adoption. Health Aff 33(2):207–215. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1054 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources