Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 16;374(1781):20190011.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0011. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

Bridging the divide between scientists and decision-makers: how behavioural ecologists can increase the conservation impact of their research?

Affiliations

Bridging the divide between scientists and decision-makers: how behavioural ecologists can increase the conservation impact of their research?

Sarah M Durant et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Effective conservation management is underpinned by science. Yet, there are often barriers against the incorporation of up-to-date scientific research into decision-making and policy. Here, we draw on experience from a multi-nation approach to conserve cheetah and African wild dogs across Africa, using relationships between scientists and managers established over more than a decade, to better understand scientific information needs of managers. While our analysis focuses on Africa, many of our findings are likely to be relevant to other regions. Managers view science as critical to their decision-making processes and strongly support scientific research, particularly when research directly addresses their information needs. However, managers reported problems in accessing final results and highlighted the need to access raw ecological data from research undertaken within protected areas. Fundamental to improving the management relevance of scientific research is the need for scientists to engage with managers through all steps of the research process, from project design and implementation through to scientific publication and end-of-project agreements. Effective engagement requires open and clear communication; including agreed processes for access to biodiversity data and submission of final results. In order to foster future scientific endeavours and collaborations, systems should be established to better facilitate information exchange, while also safeguarding the rights of scientists to publish their data and protect their academic freedom. Our analysis also calls for a greater awareness of the geo-political context under which science is undertaken, and for increased scientific participation through an inclusive approach that recognizes, and gives credit to, a wider diversity of scientific contributions and expertise. This article is part of the theme issue 'Linking behaviour to dynamics of populations and communities: application of novel approaches in behavioural ecology to conservation'.

Keywords: biodiversity conservation; conservation management; conservation policy; decision-making; environmental management; protected area management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
How scientists can factor in management at each stage of the scientific research process. (Online version in colour.)

References

    1. Simberloff D. 1988. The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 473–511. (10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.002353) - DOI
    1. Cook CN, Mascia MB, Schwartz MW, Possingham HP, Fuller RA. 2013. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge–action boundary. Conserv. Biol. 27, 669–678. (10.1111/cobi.12050) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caro TM, Durant SM. 1995. The importance of behavioural ecology for conservation biology: examples from studies of Serengeti carnivores. In Serengeti II: dynamics, management and conservation of an ecosystem (eds Sinclair ARE, Arcese P), pp. 451–472. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    1. Krebs JR, Davies NB. 1997. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 4th edn Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
    1. Caro T, Sherman PW. 2011. Endangered species and a threatened discipline: behavioural ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 111–118. (10.1016/j.tree.2010.12.008) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources