Neonatal end-of-life decision-making almost 20 years after the EURONIC study: A French survey
- PMID: 31353145
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2019.06.007
Neonatal end-of-life decision-making almost 20 years after the EURONIC study: A French survey
Abstract
Nearly 20 years ago the EURONIC study reported that French neonatologists sometimes deemed it legitimate to terminate the lives of newborn infants when the prognosis appeared extremely poor. Parents were not always informed of these decisions. Major change has occurred since then and is described herein.
Material and methods: A survey was conducted in the Île-de-France region, from 1 January to 31 January 2016. Professionals from 15 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) were invited to complete a questionnaire.
Results: A total of 702 questionnaires were collected and 670 responses were analyzed. Knowledge of the law differed according to professional status, with 71% of MDs (medical staff, MS), compared with 28% of nonmedical staff (NMS) declaring that they had good knowledge of the law. Most MDs and NMS believed that withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments (WWLST) could be decided and implemented after a delay. Half of them thought that WWLST would always result in death. Although required by law, a consulting MD attended the collegial meeting required before deciding on WWLST in only half of the cases. Parents were almost always informed of the decision thereafter by the physician in charge of their infant. The most frequent disagreement with parents was observed when WWLST was the option selected. In this case, most professionals suggested postponing WWLST, continuing intensive care and dialogue with parents, aiming at a final shared decision. Major differences were observed between NICUs with regard to the withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration. Finally, 14% of MDs declared that infant active terminations of life still occurred in their NICU. Major differences concern WWLST and active termination of life, whose meaning has been partly modified since 2001.
Conclusion: Several major changes were observed in this survey: (1) treatment withdrawal decisions are made today in agreement with the law; (2) parents' information and involvement in the decision process have profoundly changed; (3) active termination of life (euthanasia) very rarely occurs; only at the end of a process in accordance with ethical principles and within the law is this decision made.
Keywords: Decision-making process; French end-of-life law; Neonates; Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.
Copyright © 2019 French Society of Pediatrics. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses.BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 22;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1040-z. BMC Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 29471821 Free PMC article.
-
[French law related to patient's rights and end of life: pediatric intensive care unit's health professionals' opinions].Arch Pediatr. 2014 Jan;21(1):34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Dec 4. Arch Pediatr. 2014. PMID: 24315107 French.
-
End-of-Life Decisions 20 Years after EURONIC: Neonatologists' Self-Reported Practices, Attitudes, and Treatment Choices in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.J Pediatr. 2019 Apr;207:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.064. Epub 2019 Feb 13. J Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 30772016
-
Ethical Problems in Decision Making in the Neonatal ICU.N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1851-1860. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1801063. N Engl J Med. 2018. PMID: 30403936 Review. No abstract available.
-
Ethical problems in the care of high risk neonates.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Oct;23 Suppl 3:7-10. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.510647. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010. PMID: 20883143 Review.
Cited by
-
Bioethical Decisions in Neonatal Intensive Care: Neonatologists' Self-Reported Practices in Greek NICUs.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 15;17(10):3465. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103465. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32429230 Free PMC article.
-
Context of a neonatal death affects parental perception of end-of-life care, anxiety and depression in the first year of bereavement.BMC Palliat Care. 2023 May 13;22(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01183-8. BMC Palliat Care. 2023. PMID: 37173678 Free PMC article.
-
Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: The Possible Behavior of Greek Physicians, Midwives, and Nurses in Clinical Scenarios.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 9;18(8):3938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083938. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33918554 Free PMC article.
-
End-of-life decision-making in the neonatal intensive care unit.Front Pediatr. 2024 Jan 8;11:1352485. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1352485. eCollection 2023. Front Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 38259598 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Public Attitudes Toward Ethics and Practices in End-of-Life Decision-Making for Neonates.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2353264. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53264. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38270948 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous