Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;102(10):1786-1792.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.020. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

Purposeful SDM: A problem-based approach to caring for patients with shared decision making

Affiliations

Purposeful SDM: A problem-based approach to caring for patients with shared decision making

Ian G Hargraves et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Patient involvement focused the growth of Shared Decision Making (SDM) in contemporary healthcare practice, research, and education. Whilst important, securing appropriate patient involvement or equipping patients to choose is not necessarily the principal purpose of SDM. The purpose of SDM like all medical decision making is to act well in response to a patient's problem, broadly conceived. In which situations and how SDM addresses patient problems is unclear. We seek to develop a purposeful approach to SDM that is oriented to the kinds of problems that SDM might help resolve.

Methods: Through vignettes of the experience of a patient, Rachel we demonstrate different kinds of situations in which Rachel, her family, and clinicians need to make decisions together.

Results: Different methods of SDM are needed in situations of: CONCLUSION: SDM may be understood as a range of methods that vary substantially with patients' situations and the purpose that they pursue.

Practice implications: Clinicians struggle to adopt SDM when they do not see it as relevant to clinical work. Orienting SDM to the problems that patients and clinicians routinely face may further SDM adoption, education, and research.

Keywords: Involvement; Patient involvement; Problems; Purposes; Shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

No authors of this paper have a current or potential conflict of interest with the work presented in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Some of the interrelated matters that Rachel, her clinicians, and family need to work through and problem solve together to manage and advance Rachel’s situation in the ICU

References

    1. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model, Soc. Sci. Med 49(5) (1999) 651–61. - PubMed
    1. Nickel WK, Weinberger SE, Guze PA, Patient C Partnership in Healthcare, Principles for Patient and Family Partnership in Care: An American College of Physicians Position Paper, Ann. Intern. Med (2018). - PubMed
    1. Kunneman M, Montori VM, Castaneda-Guarderas A, Hess EP, What Is Shared Decision Making? (and What It Is Not), Acad Emerg Med 23(12) (2016) 1320–1324. - PubMed
    1. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hibbs R, Wilkinson C, Grol R, Shared decision making observed in clinical practice: visual displays of communication sequence and patterns, J Eval Clin Pract 7(2) (2001) 211–21. - PubMed
    1. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R, Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices, Br J Gen Pract 50(460) (2000) 892–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types