How reliable are scoring systems for hidradenitis suppurativa?

Affiliations

Comment

J A F Oosterhaven. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Sep.

. 2019 Sep;181(3):438-439.

doi: 10.1111/bjd.18249. Epub 2019 Jul 28.

¹ Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.

No abstract available

Comment on

Inter-rater agreement and reliability of outcome measurement instruments and staging systems used in hidradenitis suppurativa.
Thorlacius L, Garg A, Riis PT, Nielsen SM, Bettoli V, Ingram JR, Del Marmol V, Matusiak L, Pascual JC, Revuz J, Sartorius K, Tzellos T, van der Zee HH, Zouboulis CC, Saunte DM, Gottlieb AB, Christensen R, Jemec GBE. Thorlacius L, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Sep;181(3):483-491. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17716. Epub 2019 Jun 6. Br J Dermatol. 2019. PMID: 30724351

1. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63:737-45.
1. Clarke M. Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews. Trials 2007; 8:39.
1. Thorlacius L, Garg A, Riis PT et al. Inter-rater agreement and reliability of outcome measurement instruments and staging systems used in hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181:483-91.
1. Castorr AH, Thompson KO, Ryan JW et al. The process of rater training for observational instruments: implications for interrater reliability. Res Nurs Health 1990; 13:311-18.