Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;31(3):343-353.
doi: 10.1002/hpja.280. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

Australian women's self-perceived barriers to participation in cervical cancer screening: A systematic review

Archana Nagendiram  1 , Hannah Bougher  1 , Jennifer Banks  1 , Leanne Hall  1 , Clare Heal  1
Affiliations

Australian women's self-perceived barriers to participation in cervical cancer screening: A systematic review

Archana Nagendiram et al. Health Promot J Austr. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Australia has recently introduced a new screening program for cervical cancer. There has also been a decline in participation rates for cervical screening.

Aim: To complete a systematic literature review of the factors that prevent Australian women from participating in cervical screening.

Methods: Authors searched CINAHL, Medline, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Library to obtain articles discussing Australian women's self-identified barriers to cervical screening. Quantitative studies published in peer-reviewed journals after 1991 were considered. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42018105028.

Results: The final search produced 1749 studies, with 13 quantitative papers included in the narrative synthesis after screening by two independent reviewers. No articles were excluded due to bias.

Discussion: Self-identified barriers to screening were categorised into personal, practitioner, test-related and logistical factors. The most commonly stated barriers included lack of time, embarrassment, fear of results, irrelevance and male health professionals. The use of HPV triage in cervical screening was not a barrier to screening, however, some women regarded self-collected HPV testing as a barrier. Barriers to self-collection included desire for the general practitioner to complete the test, fear of doing the test incorrectly, wishing to include it in a general check-up and concerns about the test itself.

Conclusion: A variety of personal, practitioner, test-related and logistical barriers negatively impact the screening participation of Australian women. Further research into barriers in the Australian population, and women's attitudes towards HPV testing and self-collection is required to create effective health interventions to improve participation in cervical screening.

Keywords: Australia; National Cervical Screening Program; Pap test; barriers; cervical screening; human papillomavirus.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. AIHW. Cervical screening in Australia 2018. AIHW website. Available from https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/8a26b34d-a912-4f01-b646-dc5d0ca54f03/ai.... Updated May 7, 2018. Accessed September 2, 2018.
    1. OECD. Cervical Cancer Screening in women aged 20-69, 2003-2013 (or nearest years) in Quality of Care. OECD iLibrary Website. Available from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-.... Updated January 1, 2015. Accessed February 13, 2019.
    1. Aminisani N, Armstrong BK, Egger S, Canfell K. Impact of organised cervical screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in migrant women in Australia. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):491.
    1. McFarland DM, Gueldner SM, Mogobe KD. Integrated review of barriers to cervical cancer screening in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016;48(5):490-8.
    1. Sokal R. A critical review of the literature on the uptake of cervical and breast screening in British South Asian women. Qual Prim Care. 2010;18(4):251-61.

Publication types