Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 12:13:933-940.
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S201401. eCollection 2019.

A discrete choice experiment on preferences of patients with low back pain about non-surgical treatments: identification, refinement and selection of attributes and levels

Thomas G Poder  1   2 , Marion Beffarat  3 , Maria Benkhalti  1 , Ginette Ladouceur  2 , Pierre Dagenais  1
Affiliations

A discrete choice experiment on preferences of patients with low back pain about non-surgical treatments: identification, refinement and selection of attributes and levels

Thomas G Poder et al. Patient Prefer Adherence. .

Abstract

Objectives: Hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) needs to consider all relevant data to help decision making, including patients' preferences. In this study, we comprehensively describe the process of identification, refinement and selection of attributes and levels for a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Methods: A mixed-methods design was used to identify attributes and levels explaining low back pain (LBP) patients' choice for a non-surgical treatment. This design combined a systematic literature review with a patients' focus group, one-on-one interactions with experts and patients, and discussions with stakeholder committee members. Following the patient's focus group, preference exercises were conducted. A consensus about the attributes and levels was researched during discussions with committee members. Results: The literature review yielded 40 attributes to consider in patients' treatment choice. During the focus group, one additional attribute emerged. The preference exercises allowed selecting eight attributes for the DCE. These eight attributes and their levels were discussed and validated by the committee members who helped reframe two levels in one of the attributes and delete one attribute. The final seven attributes were: treatment modality, pain reduction, onset of treatment efficacy, duration of efficacy, difficulty in daily living activities, sleep problem, and knowledge about their body and pain. Conclusion: This study is one of the few to comprehensively describe the selection process of attributes and levels for a DCE. This may help ensure transparency and judge the quality of the decision-making process. In the context of a HB-HTA unit, this strengthens the legitimacy to perform a DCE to better inform decision makers in a patient-centered care approach.

Keywords: choice; low back pain; preference; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Facey KM, Hansen HP. Patient-focused HTAs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:273–274. doi:10.1017/S0266462311000572 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poder TG. Editorial: better understanding health preferences. Int J Heal Prefer Res. 2016;1:1.
    1. Mott DJ. Incorporating quantitative patient preference data into healthcare decision making processes: is HTA falling behind? Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Res. 2018;11:249–252. doi:10.1007/s40271-018-0305-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brooker A-S, Carcone S, Witteman W, Krahn M. Quantitative patient preference evidence for health technology assessment: a case study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:290–300. doi:10.1017/S0266462313000329 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kievit W, Tummers M, van Hoorn R, et al. Taking patient heterogeneity and preferences into account in health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33:562–569. doi:10.1017/S0266462317000885 - DOI - PubMed