Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 4:2019:9315104.
doi: 10.1155/2019/9315104. eCollection 2019.

Optimizing Acetabular Component Bone Ingrowth: The Wedge-Fit Bone Preparation Method

Affiliations

Optimizing Acetabular Component Bone Ingrowth: The Wedge-Fit Bone Preparation Method

Dani M Gaillard-Campbell et al. Adv Orthop. .

Abstract

We investigate the efficacy of a modified acetabular bone-preparation technique in reducing the incidence of two clinical problems identified in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The first issue is failure due to lack of bone ingrowth into the acetabular component. The second is a newly recognized phenomenon of early cup shift. We hypothesize that these issues might be resolved by using a "wedge-fit method", in which the component wedges into the peripheral acetabular bone rather than bottoming out and potentially toggling on the apex of the cup. Prior to November 2011, all acetabula were reamed 1 mm under and prepared with a press-fit of the porous coated acetabular component. After November 2011, we adjusted reaming by bone density. In "soft bone" (T-score <-1.0), we underreamed acetabula by 1 mm less than the outer diameter of the cup, as was previously done in all cases. For T-scores greater than -1.0, we reamed line-to-line. Additionally, we began performing an "apex relief" starting June 2012 in all cases by removing 2 mm of apex bone with a small reamer after using the largest reamer. Failure of acetabular ingrowth occurred in 0.5% of cases before the wedge-fit method and <0.1% after. Rate of cup shift was reduced from 1.1% to 0.4%. The rate of unexplained pain between 2 and 4 years postoperatively also declined significantly from 2.6% to 1.3%. Our evidence suggests that wedge-fit acetabular preparation improves initial implant stability, leading to fewer cases of early cup shift, unexplained pain, and acetabular ingrowth failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cup fixation variation for two acetabular preparation methods.

References

    1. Matharu G. S., Pandit H. G., Murray D. W., Treacy R. B. The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. International Orthopaedics. 2015;39(10):2031–2036. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2692-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amstutz H. C., Le Duff M. J. Hip resurfacing: history, current status, and future. Hip International. 2018;25(4):330–338. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000268. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McMinn D., Treacy R., Lin K., Pynsent P. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip: experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1996;329:S89–S98. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608001-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cutts S., Carter P. B. Hip resurfacing: a technology reborn. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2006;82(974):802–805. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.044594. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yue E. J., Cabanela M. E., Duffy G. P., Heckman M. G., O’Connor M. I. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2009;467(4):992–999. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0506-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources