Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Jan;125(1):82-88.
doi: 10.1111/bju.14883. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

Identifying an optimal lymph node yield for penile squamous cell carcinoma: prognostic impact of surgical dissection

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Identifying an optimal lymph node yield for penile squamous cell carcinoma: prognostic impact of surgical dissection

Juan Chipollini et al. BJU Int. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic impact of lymph node yield (LNY) on survival outcomes for penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Patients and methods: In all, 532 patients who underwent inguinal LN dissection (ILND) across tertiary referral centres from Europe, China, Brazil and North America were retrospectively evaluated. From this cohort, 198 patients received pelvic LND (PLND).We identified threshold values for ILND and PLND using receiver operating characteristic curves. We tested prognostic value of LNY for recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meir method and Cox proportional hazard regression models.

Results: The median (interquartile [IQR]) age was 59 (49-68) years and the median (IQR) follow-up after ILND was 28 (12-68.2) months. Overall, 85% of the patients had bilateral dissections. The median (IQR) number of inguinal LNs removed was 15 (10-22). Of those receiving PLND, The median (IQR) number of LNs was 13 (8-19). A LNY of ≥15 was used for dichotomisation of ILND patients, and a LNY of ≥9 was used in the PLND cohort. Patients with a LNY ≥15 had significantly better 5-year OS vs patients with a LNY <15 (70.1% vs 58.7%). On multivariable analyses, a LNY ≥15 was a predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, P = 0.029). For cN0 patients, a LNY ≥15 was an independent predictor of RFS (HR 0.52, P = 0.043) and OS (HR 0.53, P = 0.021). In the PLND cohort, a LNY ≥9 was a predictor of RFS (HR 0.53, P = 0.032).

Conclusions: Using one of the largest LND datasets to date, we found LNY to be a significant predictor of outcomes after lymphatic staging for penile SCC. Prospective validation is warranted.

Keywords: #PenileCancer; lymphadenectomy; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Arya M, Li R, Pegler K et al. Long-term trends in incidence, survival and mortality of primary penile cancer in England. Cancer Causes Control 2013; 24: 2169-76
    1. Pizzocaro G, Algaba F, Horenblas S et al. EAU penile cancer guidelines 2009. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 1002-12
    1. Christodoulidou M, Sahdev V, Houssein S, Muneer A. Epidemiology of penile cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 2015; 39: 126-36
    1. Diorio GJ, Giuliano AR. The role of human papilloma virus in penile carcinogenesis and preneoplastic lesions: a potential target for vaccination and treatment strategies. Urol Clin North Am 2016; 43: 419-25
    1. Hakenberg OW, Compérat EM, Minhas S, Necchi A, Protzel C, Watkin N. EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update. Eur Urol 2015; 67: 142-50

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources