Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 27;8(8):1114.
doi: 10.3390/jcm8081114.

Long-Term Risk Factor Control After Myocardial Infarction-A Need for Better Prevention Programmes

Affiliations
Review

Long-Term Risk Factor Control After Myocardial Infarction-A Need for Better Prevention Programmes

Rico Osteresch et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Long-term prognosis of myocardial infarction (MI) is still serious, especially in patients with MI and cardiogenic shock. To improve long-term prognosis and prevent recurrent events, sustainable cardiovascular risk factor control (RFC) after MI is crucial.

Methods: The article gives an overview on health care data regarding RFC after MI and presents recent trials on modern preventive strategies that support patients to achieve risk factor targets during long-term course.

Results: International registry studies, such as EUROASPIRE, observed alarming deficiencies in RFC after MI. As data of the German Bremen ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-Registry show, most deficiencies are found in socially disadvantaged city districts and in young patients. Several studies on prevention programmes to improve RFC after MI reported inconsistent data; however, in the recently published IPP trial a 12-months intensive prevention programme that included both repetitive personal contacts with non-physician prevention assistants and telemetric risk factor control, was associated with significant improvements of numerous risk factors (smoking, LDL and total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure and physical inactivity).

Conclusions: There is a strong need of action to improve long-term risk RFC after MI, especially in socially disadvantaged patients. Modern prevention programmes, using personal and telemetric contacts, have large potential to support patients in achieving long-term risk factor targets after coronary events.

Keywords: myocardial infarction; prevention programmes; risk factor control; socially disadvantaged districts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Socioeconomic status and incidence of STEMIs. Postal codes of home addresses of STEMI-patients in the city of Bremen/Germany and a social deprivation index were used to group patients into different categories of socioeconomic status. A negative association between low socioeconomic status and STEMI-incidence was observed with most STEMIs in socially disadvantaged city districts (G3, G4).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevention success and prevention failure associated with 12 months intensive prevention programme (IPP) vs. usual care (UC).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Strategies to increase attractiveness of long-term prevention programmes.

References

    1. Yeh R.W., Sidney S., Chandra M., Sorel M., Selby J.V., Go A.S. Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:2155–2165. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908610. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jernberg T., Hasvold P., Henriksson M., Hjelm H., Thuresson M., Janzon M. Cardiovascular risk in post-myocardial infarction patients: Nationwide real world data demonstrate the importance of a long-term perspective. Eur. Heart J. 2015;36:1163–1170. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu505. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Backhaus T., Fach A., Schmucker J., Fiehn E., Garstka D., Stehmeier J., Hambrecht R., Wienbergen H. Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Results from the Bremen STEMI Registry. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2018;107:371–379. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1192-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kudaibergenov A., Wienbergen H., Fach A., Schmucker J., Garstka D., Hamann J., Backhaus T., Osteresch R., Hambrecht R. 5-year-outcomes after STEMI—Which patients have the best long-term course? Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2018;107:V1329.
    1. Thiele H., Ohman E.M., Desch S., Eitel I., de Waha S. Management of cardiogenic shock. Eur. Heart J. 2015;36:1223–1230. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv051. - DOI - PubMed