Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 27;11(8):1063.
doi: 10.3390/cancers11081063.

Persistent Organic Pollutants and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of the Literature

Affiliations
Review

Persistent Organic Pollutants and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of the Literature

Kaoutar Ennour-Idrissi et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) bioaccumulate in the food chain and have been detected in human blood and adipose tissue. Experimental studies demonstrated that POPs can cause and promote growth of breast cancer. However, inconsistent results from epidemiological studies do not support a causal relationship between POPs and breast cancer in women. To identify individual POPs that are repeatedly found to be associated with both breast cancer incidence and progression, and to demystify the observed inconsistencies between epidemiological studies, we conducted a systematic review of 95 studies retrieved from three main electronic databases. While no clear pattern of associations between blood POPs and breast cancer incidence could be drawn, POPs measured in breast adipose tissue were more clearly associated with higher breast cancer incidence. POPs were more consistently associated with worse breast cancer prognosis whether measured in blood or breast adipose tissue. In contrast, POPs measured in adipose tissue other than breast were inversely associated with both breast cancer incidence and prognosis. Differences in biological tissues used for POPs measurement and methodological biases explain the discrepancies between studies results. Some individual compounds associated with both breast cancer incidence and progression, deserve further investigation.

Keywords: breast cancer; breast cancer prognostic; breast cancer risk; persistent organic pollutants; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow Diagram according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) [PRISMA], with modifications. *One cohort study on breast cancer mortality also reported cross-sectional analyses of prognostic factors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Connell D.W., Miller G.J., Mortimer M.R., Shaw G.R., Anderson S.M. Persistent Lipophilic Contaminants and Other Chemical Residues in the Southern Hemisphere. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999;29:47–82. doi: 10.1080/10643389991259173. - DOI
    1. Kelly B.C., Ikonomou M.G., Blair J.D., Morin A.E., Gobas F.A.P.C. Food Web-Specific Biomagnification of Persistent Organic Pollutants. Science. 2007;317:236–239. doi: 10.1126/science.1138275. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davis D.L., Bradlow H.L., Wolff M., Woodruff T., Hoel D.G., Anton-Culver H. Medical hypothesis: Xenoestrogens as preventable causes of breast cancer. Environ. Health Perspect. 1993;101:372–377. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101372. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunter D.J., Kelsey K.T. Pesticide Residues and Breast Cancer: The Harvest of a Silent Spring? J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1993;85:598–599. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.8.598. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahlborg U.G., Lipworth L., Titus-Ernstoff L., Hsieh C.-C., Hanberg A., Baron J., Trichopoulos D., Adami H.-O. Organochlorine Compounds in Relation to Breast Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, and Endometriosis: An Assessment of the Biological and Epidemiological Evidence. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1995;25:463–531. doi: 10.3109/10408449509017924. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources