Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 27;19(15):3309.
doi: 10.3390/s19153309.

Development of an EMG-Based Muscle Health Model for Elbow Trauma Patients

Affiliations

Development of an EMG-Based Muscle Health Model for Elbow Trauma Patients

Emma Farago et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Wearable robotic braces have the potential to improve rehabilitative therapies for patients suffering from musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. Ideally, a quantitative assessment of health would be incorporated into rehabilitative devices to monitor patient recovery. The purpose of this work is to develop a model to distinguish between the healthy and injured arms of elbow trauma patients based on electromyography (EMG) data. Surface EMG recordings were collected from the healthy and injured limbs of 30 elbow trauma patients while performing 10 upper-limb motions. Forty-two features and five feature sets were extracted from the data. Feature selection was performed to improve the class separation and to reduce the computational complexity of the feature sets. The following classifiers were tested: linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF). The classifiers were used to distinguish between two levels of health: healthy and injured (50% baseline accuracy rate). Maximum fractal length (MFL), myopulse percentage rate (MYOP), power spectrum ratio (PSR) and spike shape analysis features were identified as the best features for classifying elbow muscle health. A majority vote of the LDA classification models provided a cross-validation accuracy of 82.1%. The work described in this paper indicates that it is possible to discern between healthy and injured limbs of patients with MSK elbow injuries. Further assessment and optimization could improve the consistency and accuracy of the classification models. This work is the first of its kind to identify EMG metrics for muscle health assessment by wearable rehabilitative devices.

Keywords: classification; electromyography (EMG); feature selection; rehabilitation; wearable devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ten upper-limb motions performed: (a) elbow flexion (EF), (b) elbow extension (EE), (c) forearm pronation (P), (d) forearm supination (S), (e) wrist flexion (WF), (f) wrist extension (WE), (g) ulnar deviation (UD), (h) radial deviation (RD), (i) hand open (HO), and (j) hand close (HC).

References

    1. Canadian Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis IMHA Strategic Plan 2014–2018. [(accessed on 28 May 2019)];2014 Available online: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48830.html/
    1. Maciejasz P., Eschweiler J., Gerlach-Hahn K., Jansen-Troy A., Leonhardt S. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2014;11:3. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Myomo. [(accessed on 28 May 2019)];2018 Available online: http://myomo.com/
    1. Chinchalkar S.J., Szerkeres M. Rehabilitation of elbow trauma. Hand Clin. 2004;20:363–374. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.06.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fusaro I., Orsini S., Stignani Kantar S., Sforza T., Benedetti M.G., Bettelli G., Rotini R. Elbow rehabilitation in traumatic pathology. Musculoskelet. Surg. 2014;98:S95–S102. doi: 10.1007/s12306-014-0328-x. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms