Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):530.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4338-0.

Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis

Christine Alary Gauvreau  1   2   3 , Guylaine Le Dorze  4   5 , Dahlia Kairy  6   5 , Claire Croteau  4   5
Affiliations

Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis

Christine Alary Gauvreau et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Aphasia is a communication disorder affecting participation. Although there are evidence-based practice recommendations about participation and aphasia rehabilitation, it may be challenging for speech-language pathologists to ensure that rehabilitation activities have an impact on the person's participation, in part due to time limitations. Participation remains limited after rehabilitation for persons who have aphasia. Communities of practice (CoPs) are a collaborative knowledge transfer strategy that can be used for evidence-based practice implementation. The aim of this study was to describe the components and evaluate a CoP for speech-language pathologists about participation and aphasia rehabilitation.

Methods: Logic analysis was used to determine the adequacy between resources, implemented activities, outputs and short-term outcomes of the CoP. Qualitative and quantitative descriptive data were collected through observation and participants' logbooks. Outputs and outcomes of the CoP were revealed through thematic analysis and interpretation of descriptive statistics.

Results: Resources including CoP design and educational aims, human and material resources were combined to create various web-based, online and offline activities. Participants invested more time per week than expected in the CoP, shared and created clinical tools and appreciated the array of suggested activities. Participant engagement allowed them to reflect, interact and collaborate with each other. All 13 participants reported they acquired knowledge about clinical tools and 12 mentioned they reflected on their practice. While the CoP was ongoing, six participants noticed evidence-practice gaps, seven prepared to change their practice, and three changed their practice towards including more participation-based considerations.

Conclusions: This study showed that speech-language pathologists can include more participation-based approaches in aphasia rehabilitation as a result of participating in a time-bound, web-based CoP.

Keywords: Aphasia; Community of practice; Continuing education; Knowledge transfer; Logic analysis; Participation; Qualitative thematic analysis; Rehabilitation; Speech-language pathology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representation of the community of practice using the logic model
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P, Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(6). 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . International classification of functioning, disability and health. 2001.
    1. United Nations General Assembly . Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. 2007. - PubMed
    1. Laliberté MP, Alary Gauvreau C, Le Dorze G. A pilot study on how speech-language pathologists include social participation in aphasia rehabilitation. Aphasiology. 2016;30(10):1117–1133. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1100708. - DOI
    1. Verna A, Davidson B, Rose T. Speech-language pathology services for people with aphasia: a survey of current practice in Australia. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2009;11(3):191–205. doi: 10.1080/17549500902726059. - DOI