Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):10953.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47548-z.

Treatment of splenic flexure colon cancer: a comparison of three different surgical procedures: Experience of a high volume cancer center

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Treatment of splenic flexure colon cancer: a comparison of three different surgical procedures: Experience of a high volume cancer center

Daniela Rega et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Extended right or left hemicolectomy are the most common surgical treatments for splenic flexure colon cancer. Extended resection (including distal pancreasectomy and/or splenectomy), has been often indicated for the treatment for the splenic flexure cancer, because the lymphatic drainage at this site is poorly defined and assumed as heterogeneous. Between January 2006 and May 2016, 103 patients with splenic flexure colon cancer were enrolled in the study. We evaluated the clinicopathological findings and outcomes of all patients and associated them to the different surgical treatment. Out of 103 selected cases an extended right hemicolectomy was performed in 22 (21.4%) patients, an extended left hemicolectomy in 24 (23.3%) patients, a segmental resection of the splenic flexure in 57 (55.3%) patients; the combined resection of adjacent organs showing tumor adherence was carried out in 11 (10.7%) patients. The tumor infiltrated near organs (T4) in 5 patients. No significant differences in complications were found among the three groups. In all groups no differences were found in the total number of harvested lymphnodes. After a median follow-up of 42 months, 30 recurrences and 19 deaths occurred (12 for tumor progression). There was no difference in overall and progression free survival among the three different surgical treatments. According to our results, the partial resection of splenic flexure was not associated with a worse prognosis and it was leading for a satisfactory oncological outcome. It is our opinion that the extended surgery is seldomly indicated to cure splenic flexure cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progression free survival curves by surgical treatment groups. Solid line: segmental splenic flexure resection (SSFR), dashed line: extended left hemicolectomy (ELH), dotted line: extended right hemicolectomy (ERH).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall survival curves by surgical treatment groups. Solid line: segmental splenic flexure resection (SSFR), dashed line: extended left hemicolectomy (ELH), dotted line: extended right hemicolectomy (ERH).

References

    1. Steffen C, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH. Carcinoma of the splenic flexure. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30:872–4. doi: 10.1007/BF02555427. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levien DH, Gibbons S, Begos D, Byrne DW. Survival after resection of carcinoma of the splenic flexure. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:401–3. doi: 10.1007/BF02053691. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shaikh IA, et al. Does the outcome of colonic flexure cancers differ from the other colonic sites? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:89–93. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1292-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nakagoe T, et al. Carcinoma of the splenic flexure: multivariate analysis of predictive factors for clinicopathological characteristics and outcome after surgery. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:528–35. doi: 10.1007/s005350070076. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bourgouin S, et al. Three-dimensional determination of variability in colon anatomy: applications for numerical modeling of the intestine. J Surg Res. 2012;178:172–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.03.054. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types