Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;50(5):1913-1927.
doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-1427-4. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

Female Genital Cutting and Deinfibulation: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Research and Practice

Affiliations

Female Genital Cutting and Deinfibulation: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Research and Practice

Sonya S Brady et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

At least 200 million girls and women across the world have experienced female genital cutting (FGC). International migration has grown substantially in recent decades, leading to a need for health care providers in regions of the world that do not practice FGC to become knowledgeable and skilled in their care of women who have undergone the procedure. There are four commonly recognized types of FGC (Types I, II, III, and IV). To adhere to recommendations advanced by the World Health Organization (WHO) and numerous professional organizations, providers should discuss and offer deinfibulation to female patients who have undergone infibulation (Type III FGC), particularly before intercourse and childbirth. Infibulation involves narrowing the vaginal orifice through cutting and appositioning the labia minora and/or labia majora, and creating a covering seal over the vagina with appositioned tissue. The WHO has published a handbook for health care providers that includes guidance in counseling patients about deinfibulation and performing the procedure. Providers may benefit from additional guidance in how to discuss FGC and deinfibulation in a manner that is sensitive to each patient's culture, community, and values. Little research is available to describe decision-making about deinfibulation among women. This article introduces a theoretically informed conceptual model to guide future research and clinical conversations about FGC and deinfibulation with women who have undergone FGC, as well as their partners and families. This conceptual model, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, may facilitate conversations that lead to shared decision-making between providers and patients.

Keywords: Deinfibulation; Female circumcision; Female genital cutting; Female genital mutilation; Infibulation; Reinfibulation; Shared decision-making; Theory of Planned Behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Theory of Planned Behavior, applied to a woman’s decision to deinfibulate after experiencing female genital cutting (FGC).

Comment in

References

    1. Abdulcadir J, Marras S, Catania L, Abdulcadir O, & Petignat P (In Press). Defibulation: A visual reference and learning tool. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. - PubMed
    1. Ajzen I (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
    1. Almroth-Berggren V, Almroth L, Bergström S, Hassanein OM, El Hadi N, & Lithell U (2001). Reinfibulation among women in a rural area in central Sudan. Health Care for Women International, 22, 711–721.
    1. American Academy of Family Physicians. (AAFP). (n.d.). Female genital mutilation. Retrieved from https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/genital-mutilation.html
    1. American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM). (2017). Position Statement: Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. Retrieved from http://www.midwife.org/ACNM/files/ACNMLibraryData/UPLOADFILENAME/0000000...

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources