Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 15;147(2):472-477.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.32598. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

Radioresistance of KRAS/TP53-mutated lung cancer can be overcome by radiation dose escalation or EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition in vivo

Affiliations

Radioresistance of KRAS/TP53-mutated lung cancer can be overcome by radiation dose escalation or EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition in vivo

Kristin Gurtner et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

Recent clinical data have linked KRAS/TP53 comutation (mut) to resistance to radiotherapy (RT), but supporting laboratory in vivo evidence is lacking. In addition, the ability of different radiation doses, with/without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed treatment, to achieve local tumor control as a function of KRAS status is unknown. Here, we assessed clonogenic radiation survival of a panel of annotated lung cancer cell lines. KRASmut/TP53mut was associated with the highest radioresistance in nonisogenic and isogenic comparisons. To validate these findings, isogenic TP53mut NCI-H1703 models, KRASmut or wild-type (wt), were grown as heterotopic xenografts in nude mice. A clinical RT schedule of 30 fractions over 6 weeks was employed. The dose that controlled 50% of tumors (TCD50 ) was calculated. The TCD50 for KRASwt/TP53mut xenografts was 43.1 Gy whereas KRASmut/TP53mut tumors required a 1.9-fold higher TCD50 of 81.4 Gy. The EGFR inhibitor erlotinib radiosensitized KRASmut but not KRASwt cells and xenografts. The TCD50 associated with adding erlotinib to RT was 58.8 Gy for KRASmut, that is, a ~1.4-fold dose enhancement. However, the EGFR antibody cetuximab did not have a radiosensitizing effect. In conclusion, we demonstrate for the first time that KRASmut in a TP53mut background confers radioresistance when studying a clinical RT schedule and local control rather than tumor growth delay. Despite the known unresponsiveness of KRASmut tumors to EGFR inhibitors, erlotinib radiosensitized KRASmut tumors. Our data highlight KRAS/TP53 comutation as a candidate biomarker of radioresistance that can be at least partially reversed by dose escalation or the addition of a targeted agent.

Keywords: KRAS mutation; cetuximab; erlotinib; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement

In the past 5 years, Dr. Baumann attended an advisory board meeting of MERCK KGaA (Darmstadt), for which the University of Dresden received a travel grant. He further received funding for his research projects and for educational grants to the University of Dresden by Teutopharma GmbH (2011–2015), IBA (2016), Bayer AG (2016–2018), Merck KGaA (2016–2030), Medipan GmbH (2014–2018). Dr. Baumann, as former chair of OncoRay (Dresden) and present CEO and Scientific Chair of the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ, Heidelberg), signed/s contracts for his institute(s) and for the staff for research funding and collaborations with a multitude of companies worldwide. For the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ, Heidelberg) Dr. Baumann is on the supervisory boards of HI-STEM gGmbH (Heidelberg).

Within the past 5 years, Dr. Krause received funding for her research projects by IBA (2016), Merck KGaA (2014–2018 for preclinical study; 2018–2020 for clinical study), Medipan GmbH (2014–2018).

Merck KGaA (Cetuximab) and Hoffmann-La Roche (Erlotinib) provided for Dr. Baumann, Dr. Krause, Dr. Gurtner, Dr. Koi free drugs for previous preclinical studies.

For the present study, Dr. Baumann, Dr. Krause, Dr. Gurtner and Dr. Koi confirm that none of the above mentioned funding sources were involved in the study design or materials used, nor in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data nor in the writing of the paper.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Radiation survival of NSCLC cell lines as a function of genotype. (A) Clonogenic survival of 17 NSCLC cell lines treated with single dose irradiation from 2 to 8 Gy. Each data point represents the average survival from typically 3 biological repeats for one cell line. Survival curves were fitted using the LQ formula (see Supplementary Methods) for KRAS-mutant (mut) vs. wild-type (wt) cell lines. Statistical comparison of the curves was performed using the F-test (see Supplementary Methods). (B) A subset of NSCLC cell lines was maintained and irradiated under anchorage-independent growth conditions, and the fraction of cells remaining after irradiation with 6 Gy were estimated using a metabolic assay as described. (C) Heatmap to illustrate the impact of KRAS/TP53 status on radiation survival of NSCLC cell lines. Relative radioresistance is indicated by red colors, representing the ratio of cell survival fraction at a given dose level for a given cell line and the geometric mean of survival fractions for all cell lines at that dose level. Ratios were arbitrarily binned as shown.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Impact of KRAS status on radioresistance in an isogenic model system. (A) Clonogenic radiation survival of NCI-H1703 cells with endogenous wt KRAS, stably transfected with a KRAS mut (G12V) or a KRAS wt transgene or with an empty vector control. Survival curves were compared with the F-test. (B) Illustration of experimental set-up for determining local tumour control of NCI-H1703 xenografts transplanted on the hind legs of nude mice. (C) Measured local tumour control rates and estimated local tumour control probabilities (TCP) for NCI-H1703 xenografts with or without expression of mutant KRAS protein, where H1703 transfected with vector are designated “wt”. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of tumour control dose 50% (TCD50).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Radiosensitizing effects of erlotinib. (A) Dose modifying factor (DMF) for single dose RT with or without erlotinib in the different NCI-H1703 clones. DMF is the ratio of dose for RT alone and dose of RT plus erlotinib needed to sterilize 50% of cells in a clonogenic survival assay in vitro based on 2–3 biological repeats (see also Fig. S4). Values above 1.0 (dotted line) signify radiosensitization. (B) Measured local tumour control rates and estimated local tumour control probabilities (TCP) for NCI-H1703 xenografts with or without expression of mutant KRAS protein, with and without EGFR-inhibition. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of tumour control dose 50% (TCD50). (C) DMF as the ratio of TCD50 values for RT alone and RT plus erlotinib, taken from panel B (see also Fig. S3).

References

    1. Kirsch DG, Diehn M, Kesarwala AH, Maity A, Morgan MA, Schwarz JK, Bristow R, Demaria S, Eke I, Griffin RJ, Haas-Kogan D, Higgins GS, et al. The Future of Radiobiology. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018;110: 329–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumann M, Krause M, Overgaard J, Debus J, Bentzen SM, Daartz J, Richter C, Zips D, Bortfeld T. Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine. Nat Rev Cancer 2016;16: 234–49. - PubMed
    1. Bristow RG, Alexander B, Baumann M, Bratman SV, Brown JM, Camphausen K, Choyke P, Citrin D, Contessa JN, Dicker A, Kirsch DG, Krause M, et al. Combining precision radiotherapy with molecular targeting and immunomodulatory agents: a guideline by the American Society for Radiation Oncology. Lancet Oncol 2018;19: e240–e51. - PubMed
    1. Aviel-Ronen S, Blackhall FH, Shepherd FA, Tsao MS. K-ras mutations in non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a review. Clin Lung Cancer 2006;8: 30–8. - PubMed
    1. Bernhard EJ, Stanbridge EJ, Gupta S, Gupta AK, Soto D, Bakanauskas VJ, Cerniglia GJ, Muschel RJ, McKenna WG. Direct evidence for the contribution of activated N-ras and K-ras oncogenes to increased intrinsic radiation resistance in human tumor cell lines. Cancer Res 2000;60: 6597–600. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms