Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov;22(11):1940-1956.
doi: 10.1111/ele.13348. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

Forecasting species range dynamics with process-explicit models: matching methods to applications

Affiliations
Review

Forecasting species range dynamics with process-explicit models: matching methods to applications

Natalie J Briscoe et al. Ecol Lett. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Knowing where species occur is fundamental to many ecological and environmental applications. Species distribution models (SDMs) are typically based on correlations between species occurrence data and environmental predictors, with ecological processes captured only implicitly. However, there is a growing interest in approaches that explicitly model processes such as physiology, dispersal, demography and biotic interactions. These models are believed to offer more robust predictions, particularly when extrapolating to novel conditions. Many process-explicit approaches are now available, but it is not clear how we can best draw on this expanded modelling toolbox to address ecological problems and inform management decisions. Here, we review a range of process-explicit models to determine their strengths and limitations, as well as their current use. Focusing on four common applications of SDMs - regulatory planning, extinction risk, climate refugia and invasive species - we then explore which models best meet management needs. We identify barriers to more widespread and effective use of process-explicit models and outline how these might be overcome. As well as technical and data challenges, there is a pressing need for more thorough evaluation of model predictions to guide investment in method development and ensure the promise of these new approaches is fully realised.

Keywords: Demography; mechanistic; population dynamics; process-based models; species distribution model.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams, V.M., Petty, A.M., Douglas, M.M., Buckley, Y.M., Ferdinands, K.B., Okazaki, T. et al. (2015). Distribution, demography and dispersal model of spatial spread of invasive plant populations with limited data. Methods Ecol. Evol., 6, 782-794.
    1. Akçakaya, H.R. (2000). Viability analyses with habitat-based metapopulation models. Popul. Ecol., 42, 45-53.
    1. Altwegg, R., Wheeler, M. & Erni, B. (2008). Climate and the range dynamics of species with imperfect detection. Biol. Lett., 4, 581-584.
    1. Araújo, M.B., Pearson, R.G., Thuiller, W. & Erhard, M. (2005). Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. Glob. Change Biol., 11, 1504-1513.
    1. Araújo, M.B., Anderson, R.P., Barbosa, A.M., Beale, C.M., Dormann, C.F., Early, R. et al. (2019). Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments. Sci. Adv, 5, p.eaat4858.

LinkOut - more resources