Impact of stored red cells on clinical outcome in critically ill
- PMID: 31360005
- PMCID: PMC6580832
- DOI: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_76_18
Impact of stored red cells on clinical outcome in critically ill
Abstract
Background: The use and benefit of fresh blood and leuco-reduced blood for critically ill patients has been inconclusive. In this study we have tried to observe the same, in patients admitted to intensive care unit.
Study design and methods: Prospective study was done to observe the effect of transfusion in critically ill patients in a tertiary care hospital. Clinical condition in cases and controls was assessed with the help of Simplified Acute Physiology Score II scoring tool. Clinical outcome among patients who received blood was compared using two cutoffs, 14 and 21 days of shelf life to delineate fresh from old blood. Length of hospital stay, length of stay in ICU, number of days on ventilator and number of hospital acquired infections were used as the surrogate markers for morbidity.
Results: Of the 558 critically ill patients admitted during the study period, 427 received (cases) while 131 did not receive the transfusion (controls). Mean SAPS II scores of cases and controls were comparable. We observed a significantly higher rate of mortality among patients who received RBC units over 21 days. However morbidity parameters were affected even when the cutoff of 14 days is considered. Buffy-coat reduced blood did not influence the outcome in the study group.
Conclusion: Critically ill patients may be prioritized for receiving fresher units of packed red cells preferably less than 21 days old. Transfusion is an independent risk factor for morbidity. Hence the risk to benefit ratio should be carefully assessed for every red cell transfusion in critically ill patients.
Keywords: Blood transfusion; critically ill; fresh blood; storage lesion; stored blood.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Association between the length of storage of transfused leukoreduced red blood cell units and hospital-acquired infections in critically ill children: A secondary analysis of the TRIPICU study.Transfus Med. 2021 Dec;31(6):467-473. doi: 10.1111/tme.12824. Epub 2021 Sep 28. Transfus Med. 2021. PMID: 34585466
-
Efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in critically ill patients admitted to a long-term acute care facility: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;34(9):2310-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000233873.17954.42. Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16878035 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Fresh vs Standard-issue Red Blood Cell Transfusions on Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2179-2190. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.17478. JAMA. 2019. PMID: 31821429 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Transfusion practice in the critically ill.Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec;31(12 Suppl):S668-71. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000099348.99451.84. Crit Care Med. 2003. PMID: 14724464 Review.
-
Anemia and red blood cell transfusion in the critically ill.Semin Dial. 2006 Nov-Dec;19(6):513-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2006.00214.x. Semin Dial. 2006. PMID: 17150052 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Age of Transfused Red Blood Cell Units on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients.Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2024 Jul;40(3):460-468. doi: 10.1007/s12288-024-01737-7. Epub 2024 Feb 24. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2024. PMID: 39011255 Free PMC article.
-
Transfusion trigger in the critically ill with sepsis or septic shock: A prospective study.Indian J Med Res. 2023 Sep;158(3):276-283. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_329_22. Indian J Med Res. 2023. PMID: 37815070 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Card RT. Red cell membrane changes during storage. Transfus Med Rev. 1988;2:40–7. - PubMed
-
- Chin-Yee I, Arya N, d’Almeida MS. The red cell storage lesion and its implication for transfusion. Transfus Sci. 1997;18:447–58. - PubMed
-
- Ho J, Sibbald WJ, Chin-Yee IH. Effects of storage on efficacy of red cell transfusion: When is it not safe? Crit Care Med. 2003;31:S687–97. - PubMed