Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 16;10(44):4513-4515.
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27077.

Real-world evidence to guide healthcare policies in oncology

Affiliations

Real-world evidence to guide healthcare policies in oncology

Marco Donia et al. Oncotarget. .

Abstract

Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) in oncology enroll patients who meet strict protocol-specified criteria. Many of these criteria overlap across multiple RCTs. A vast proportion of patients with metastatic cancer do not meet such criteria. Hence, patient populations encountered in clinical practice are essentially different from RCT-populations, questioning the representativeness of these trials. A real-world evidence approach, using data from clinical practice, is increasingly employed to complement the information on drug safety and efficacy obtained from traditional clinical trials.

Keywords: clinical trial eligibility; real-world data; real-world evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST MD received honoraria for lectures from Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and Astra Zeneca. IMS received honoraria for consultancies and lectures from Novartis, Roche, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Incyte.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Survival of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma in the pre-modern era (2012), early-modern era (2014) and modern era (2016).
Kaplan–Meier plot showing the survival of all patients diagnosed with melanoma, not amenable to surgery or other local treatment, in the whole population of Denmark in the calendar years 2012, 2014 and 2016. mo: months.

References

    1. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, de Oliveira AC, Santoro A, Raoul JL, Forner A, Schwartz M, Porta C, Zeuzem S, et al. , and SHARP Investigators Study Group . Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359:378–90. 10.1056/NEJMoa0708857. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, Tsao CJ, Qin S, Kim JS, Luo R, Feng J, Ye S, Yang TS, Xu J, Sun Y, Liang H, et al. . Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10:25–34. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanoff HK, Chang Y, Lund JL, O’Neil BH, Dusetzina SB. Sorafenib Effectiveness in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncologist. 2016; 21:1113–20. 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0478. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoo SH, Keam B, Kim M, Kim TM, Kim D, Heo DS. Generalization and representativeness of phase III immune checkpoint blockade trials in non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer. 2018; 9:736–744. 10.1111/1759-7714.12641. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heng DYC, Choueiri TK, Rini BI, Lee J, Yuasa T, Pal SK, Srinivas S, Bjarnason GA, Knox JJ, Mackenzie M, Vaishampayan UN, Tan MH, Rha SY, et al. . Outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma that do not meet eligibility criteria for clinical trials. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25:149–54. 10.1093/annonc/mdt492. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources