Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 29:163:D3523.

[Care contacts of elderly patients in the emergency care pathway: a retrospective cohort study]

[Article in Dutch]
Sivera A A Berben  1 , Anneke Bloemhoff  1   2 , Karin C F Habets  1 , Janine Liefers  1 , Chantal J M Hensens  3 , Pierre M van Grunsven  4 , Yvonne Schoon  5 , H A M van den Berg  1
Affiliations
  • PMID: 31361407

[Care contacts of elderly patients in the emergency care pathway: a retrospective cohort study]

[Article in Dutch]
Sivera A A Berben et al. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. .

Abstract

Objective: To gain insight into the differences in emergency care offered to elderly (65+ years) and younger patients (20-64 years). The emergency care pathway includes: out-of-hours general practitioner cooperatives, regional ambulance services, psychiatric emergency medical services, accident and emergency departments and acute cardiac care units.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Method: We used data from all emergency care contacts from the Emergency Care Monitor of April 2015 and April 2016 from an emergency care region in the east of the Netherlands ('Acute Zorgregio Oost'); this involved 84,647 care contacts with 55,061 patients. We defined pathway emergency care contacts as multiple emergency care contacts with different healthcare providers within the emergency care pathway, and differentiated between single or repeated care contacts with a single emergency healthcare provider. We investigated differences in presenting symptoms, diagnoses, lead time, hospital admissions and mortality in the chain care.

Results: Emergency care contact was more often pathway contact in elderly than in younger patients (26% vs. 16%; p < 0.0001). Elderly patients more often received a diagnosis of CVA, pneumonia or exacerbation of COPD, while younger patients more often had simple contusions or abdominal symptoms. Pathway lead time was longer in elderly than in younger patients (median difference: 33 minutes; 95% CI: 25-40. Elderly patients were admitted to hospital more often (71% vs. 39%, p < 0.0001) and their mortality rate was higher (2.0% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Elderly patients in the emergency care pathway have more frequent and longer pathway contact and present themselves with a more complicated and life-threatening clinical picture than younger patients. New solutions should be explored to ensure that the emergency care pathway remains accessible and available and offers sufficient quality for the increasing number of elderly.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms