Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Aug;31(4):287-305.
doi: 10.1521/aeap.2019.31.4.287.

Measuring Acceptability and Engagement of The Keep It Up! Internet-Based HIV Prevention Randomized Controlled Trial for Young Men Who Have Sex With Men

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Measuring Acceptability and Engagement of The Keep It Up! Internet-Based HIV Prevention Randomized Controlled Trial for Young Men Who Have Sex With Men

Krystal Madkins et al. AIDS Educ Prev. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

HIV disproportionately impacts young men of color who have sex with men. Keep It Up! (KIU!) is an online intervention that addresses the needs of this population. The study objective was to examine intervention acceptability and engagement. Outcomes of interests were qualitative and quantitative acceptability and engagement measures, content ratings, and paradata. On average, participants rated content (4 out of 5 stars) and acceptability (3.5 out of 4) highly. Compared to White participants, Black participants found KIU! more useful, engaging, and acceptable; Latino participants found KIU! more engaging; and other non-White participants found KIU! more engaging and acceptable. Participants with high school or less education found KIU! more useful, engaging, acceptable, and deserving of five stars than college graduates (p values = .047, <.001, .002, .01) and graduate degree holders (p values = .04, .001, <.001, .004). KIU! is a promising prevention tool for highest risk populations.

Keywords: HIV prevention; Keep It Up!; MSM; eHealth engagement measurement; intervention acceptability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bailey J, Mann S, Wayal S, Abraham C, & Murray E (2015). Digital media interventions for sexual health promotion-opportunities and challenges: a great way to reach people, particularly those at increased risk of sexual ill health. BMJ, 350, h1099. doi:10.1136/bmj.h1099 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bailey J, Mann S, Wayal S, Hunter R, Free C, Abraham C, & Murray E (2015). Sexual health promotion for young people delivered via digital media: A scoping review. Public Health Research, 3(13). doi:10.3310/phr03130 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baltierra NB, Muessig KE, Pike EC, LeGrand S, Bull SS, & Hightow-Weidman LB (2016). More than just tracking time: Complex measures of user engagement with an internet-based health promotion intervention. J Biomed Inform, 59, 299–307. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.12.015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barello S, Triberti S, Graffigna G, Libreri C, Serino S, Hibbard J, & Riva G (2015). eHealth for Patient Engagement: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol, 6, 2013. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell SG, Newcomer SF, Bachrach C, Borawski E, Jemmott JB 3rd, Morrison D, … Zimmerman R (2007). Challenges in replicating interventions. J Adolesc Health, 40(6), 514–520. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.09.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms