Pay for performance and hip fracture outcomes: an interrupted time series and difference-in-differences analysis in England and Scotland
- PMID: 31362544
- PMCID: PMC6683232
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B8.BJJ-2019-0173.R1
Pay for performance and hip fracture outcomes: an interrupted time series and difference-in-differences analysis in England and Scotland
Abstract
Aims: Hip fractures are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and costs. One strategy for improving outcomes is to incentivize hospitals to provide better quality of care. We aimed to determine whether a pay-for-performance initiative affected hip fracture outcomes in England by using Scotland, which did not participate in the scheme, as a control.
Materials and methods: We undertook an interrupted time series study with data from all patients aged more than 60 years with a hip fracture in England (2000 to 2018) using the Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (HES APC) data set linked to national death registrations. Difference-in-differences (DID) analysis incorporating equivalent data from the Scottish Morbidity Record was used to control for secular trends. The outcomes were 30-day and 365-day mortality, 30-day re-admission, time to operation, and acute length of stay.
Results: There were 1 037 860 patients with a hip fracture in England and 116 594 in Scotland. Both 30-day (DID -1.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.0 to -1.2) and 365-day (-1.9%; 95% CI -2.5 to -1.3) mortality fell in England post-intervention when compared with outcomes in Scotland. There were 7600 fewer deaths between 2010 and 2016 that could be attributed to interventions driven by pay-for-performance. A pre-existing annual trend towards increased 30-day re-admissions in England was halted post-intervention. Significant reductions were observed in the time to operation and length of stay.
Conclusion: This study provides evidence that a pay-for-performance programme improved the outcomes after a hip fracture in England. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1015-1023.
Keywords: Best practice tariff; Hip fracture; Pay-for-performance.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Learning From England's Best Practice Tariff: Process Measure Pay-for-Performance Can Improve Hip Fracture Outcomes.Ann Surg. 2022 Mar 1;275(3):506-514. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004305. Ann Surg. 2022. PMID: 33491982 Free PMC article.
-
A quasi-experimental evaluation of the association between implementation of Quality-Based Procedures funding for hip fractures and improvements in processes and outcomes for hip fracture patients in Ontario: an interrupted time series analysis.Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jun;71(6):751-760. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02702-8. Epub 2024 Feb 26. Can J Anaesth. 2024. PMID: 38409524 English.
-
The impact of pay-for-performance incentives for stroke unit access on public hospital costs and use, Queensland, 2012-17: interrupted time series analysis.Med J Aust. 2025 Mar 17;222(5):249-258. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52607. Epub 2025 Feb 25. Med J Aust. 2025. PMID: 39995287 Free PMC article.
-
Early effect of a financial incentive for surgeries within 48 h after hip fracture on the number of expedited hip fracture surgeries, in-hospital mortality, perioperative morbidity, length of stay and inpatient medical expenses.J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e14189. doi: 10.1111/jep.14189. Epub 2024 Oct 16. J Eval Clin Pract. 2025. PMID: 39415514 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of oral anticoagulant use on surgical delay and mortality in hip fracture.Bone Joint J. 2021 Feb;103-B(2):222-233. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0583.R2. Bone Joint J. 2021. PMID: 33517730
Cited by
-
Important perioperative factors, guidelines and outcomes in the management of hip fracture.J Perioper Pract. 2021 Apr;31(4):140-146. doi: 10.1177/1750458920915656. Epub 2020 Apr 17. J Perioper Pract. 2021. PMID: 32301387 Free PMC article.
-
Increased 30-day mortality rate in patients admitted with hip fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Oct;47(5):1327-1334. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01649-5. Epub 2021 Mar 30. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021. PMID: 33783567 Free PMC article.
-
Leveraging financial incentives and behavioural economics to engage physicians in achieving quality-improvement process measures.Can J Surg. 2022 Apr 27;65(2):E290-E295. doi: 10.1503/cjs.017320. Print 2022 Mar-Apr. Can J Surg. 2022. PMID: 35477679 Free PMC article.
-
Which performance indicators are used globally for evaluating healthcare in patients with a hip fracture? : a mixed methods systematic review.Bone Jt Open. 2025 Mar 6;6(3):275-290. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0104.R1. Bone Jt Open. 2025. PMID: 40043739 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of pay-for-performance on hospital readmissions in Lebanon: an ARIMA-based intervention analysis using routine data.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1551. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12045-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39639342 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:1726–1733. - PubMed
-
- Burge RT, Worley D, Johansen A, Bhattacharyya S, Bose U. The cost of osteoporotic fractures in the UK: projections for 2000–2010. J Med Econ 2001;4:51–62.
-
- Maynard A. The powers and pitfalls of payment for performance. Health Econ 2012;21:3–12. - PubMed