Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 30;18(1):119.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1021-3.

Recognition: key to the entrepreneurial strategies of rural coalitions in advancing access to health care

Affiliations

Recognition: key to the entrepreneurial strategies of rural coalitions in advancing access to health care

Kathy L Rush et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Objectives: Considerable evidence has advanced the role of citizen-led coalitions (CLC) in supporting the health and social needs of rural citizens. There has been little research focusing on the experiences and strategies of coalitions, with their limited resources and status, in targeting health inequities in their rural communities. The aim of this study was to understand the entrepreneurial strategies and experiences of rural coalitions to effect change in the delivery of health services for their older adult populations.

Method: A qualitative descriptive study method was used to generate understanding of the entrepreneurial experiences and strategies of CLCs in advancing health services to meet the health and social needs of their citizens. Seven diverse CLCs (n = 40) from different rural communities participated in focus groups and in individual and coalition-level surveys. Thematic analysis was used to construct themes from the data.

Results: Two over-riding themes emerged: entrepreneurial strategies and societal recognition. CLCs engaged in numerous entrepreneurial strategies that enabled actions and outcomes in meeting their health care needs. These strategies included: securing quick wins, leveraging existing resources, and joining forces with stakeholder groups/individuals. However, despite these strategies and successes, coalitions expressed frustration with not being seen and not being heard by decision-makers. This pointed to a key structural barrier to coalition successes -- a broader societal and institutional problem of failing to recognize not only the health needs of rural citizens, but also the legitimacy of the community coalitions to represent and act on those needs.

Conclusions: Despite the potential for coalitions to mobilize and effect change in addressing the inequities of rural health service access for older adults, broader barriers to their recognition, may undermine their entrepreneurial strategies and success.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have any competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Dandy K, Bollman RD. Seniors in rural Canada. Statistics Canada: Ottawa, ON; 2009.
    1. Wong S, Regan S. Patient perspectives on primary care in rural communities: effects of geography on access, continuity and efficiency. Rural Remote Health. 2009;1142(Online):9. - PubMed
    1. Williams AMC, Kulig J. Health and place in rural Canada. In: Kulig JC, Williams AM, editors. Health in rural Canada: Vancouver. UBC Press; 2011. p. 1–22.
    1. Keating N, editor. Rural Ageing: A good place to grow old? Bristol. UK: Policy Press; 2008.
    1. Department of Justice. Canada Health Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-6). 2011. Available from: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/C-6.pdf.

Publication types

MeSH terms