Efficacy of different surgical approaches in the clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial in China
- PMID: 31362966
- PMCID: PMC6677993
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029055
Efficacy of different surgical approaches in the clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial in China
Abstract
Introduction: In the last three decades, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for radical hysterectomy (RH) has become a popular treatment option for early-stage cervical cancer. However, a recently published randomised controlled trial (LACC trial) and an epidemiological study in the USA revealed strong evidence against the survival advantage of MIS for RH. However, the influencing factors of research centres and the learning curves of surgeons in these studies lacked sufficient evaluation. The efficacy of different surgical approaches for early-stage cervical cancer in the clinical and survival outcomes remains to be validated.
Methods and analysis: Patients diagnosed with FIGO (2009) stage IA1 (with lymphovascular space invasion), IA2 or IB1 cervical cancer with histological subtype of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma will be recruited in this multicentre randomised controlled study. Patients will be randomly assigned to undergo MIS (robot-assisted or laparoscopic RH) or abdominal RH. Within 2 years, 1448 patients in 28 centres in China will be recruited to meet the criteria of a non-inferiority threshold of HR of 1.6 with bilateral nominal α <0.05 and power of 0.8. All surgeries will be performed by the indicated experienced surgeons. At least 100 RH cases in the individual past one decade of practice will be analysed as proof of learning curves. The primary objective of this study is 5-year disease-free survival. The secondary objectives include the overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate, disease-free survival rate, cost-effectiveness and quality of life.
Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital and is filed on record by all other centres. Written informed consent will be obtained from all eligible participants before enrolment. The results will be disseminated through community events, academic conferences, student theses and peer-reviewed journals.
Trial registration number: NCT03739944.
Keywords: abdominal surgery; cervical cancer; disease-free survival; laparoscopy; learning curve; radical hysterectomy.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of different surgical approaches on survival outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol for a multicentre longitudinal study in China.BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e038020. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038020. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32819996 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):851-860. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30081-4. Lancet Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32502445 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31. N Engl J Med. 2018. PMID: 30380365 Clinical Trial.
-
Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review.J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jan;34(1):e5. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e5. Epub 2022 Nov 10. J Gynecol Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36424702 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):544-555.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.023. Epub 2020 Dec 24. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33359291
Cited by
-
Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00919-z. Epub 2022 Feb 15. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35167007 Review.
-
Increased Institutional Surgical Experience in Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Reduces Recurrence Rate: Results from a Nationwide Study.J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 19;9(11):3715. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113715. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 33228139 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy study of laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery using an endoscopic stapler for inhibiting tumour spillage of cervical malignant neoplasms evaluating survival (SOLUTION): a multi-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial protocol.BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09429-z. BMC Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35346103 Free PMC article.
-
The basic principles of oncologic surgery during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy.J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;31(1):e33. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e33. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31833260 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Efficacy of different surgical approaches on survival outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol for a multicentre longitudinal study in China.BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e038020. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038020. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32819996 Free PMC article.
References
-
- NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). cervical cancer. version 2.2019, 2018. Available: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdf