Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;29(5):548-555.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055066. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

Tobacco control in Nepal during a time of government turmoil (1960-2006)

Affiliations

Tobacco control in Nepal during a time of government turmoil (1960-2006)

Dharma Bhatta et al. Tob Control. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Nepal was a monarchy, then a dictatorship, then a democracy. This paper reviews how tobacco control progressed in Nepal in the context of these changes in government from 1950 through 2006.

Methods: We triangulated tobacco industry documents, newspaper articles and key informant interviews.

Results: Until 1983, the tobacco industry was mostly state owned. Transnational tobacco companies entered the Nepalese market through ventures with Surya Tobacco Company Private Limited (with Imperial Tobacco Company and British American Tobacco) in 1983 and Seti Cigarette Factory Limited (with Philip Morris International [PMI]) in 1985. Seminars and conferences on tobacco, celebrations of World No Tobacco Day (WNTD) and efforts by WHO helped promote tobacco control in Nepal beginning in the 1970s. Tobacco advocates in Nepal pushed the government to issue executive orders banning smoking in public places in 1992 and tobacco advertising in electronic media in 1998, and to introduce a tobacco health tax in 1993. The tobacco industry lobbied against these measures and succeeded in keeping the tobacco tax low by challenging it in court. Tobacco advocates sued the government in 2003 and 2005, resulting in a June 2006 Supreme Court decision upholding the smoking and advertising bans and requiring the government to enact a comprehensive tobacco control law.

Conclusions: Political instability, conflict, weak governance and the dictatorship significantly affect tobacco control activities in low-income and middle-income countries. Nepal shows that tobacco control advocates can take advantage of global events, such as WNTD, and use domestic litigation to maintain support from civil societies and to advocate for stronger tobacco control policies.

Keywords: advocacy; litigation; low/middle income country; tobacco industry; tobacco industry documents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mamudu HM, Hammond R, Glantz S. Tobacco industry attempts to counter the world bank report curbing the epidemic and obstruct the who framework convention on tobacco control. Soc Sci Med 2008;67:1690–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh JS. From Hindu Monarchy to Secular Republic: Challenges before Nepal’s Constituent Assembly. India Quarterly 2009;65:295–311.
    1. Karki YB, Pant KD, Pande BR. A study on the economics of tobacco in Nepal 1818 H street. 20433. Washington DC: NW, 2003. (accessed October 01, 2018).
    1. Ministry of health and population. brief profile on tobacco control in Nepal. Nepal: 2010. http://www.who.int/fctc/reporting/party_reports/nepal_2012_annex2_tobacc... (accessed November 10, 2018).
    1. Muni SD. Foreign policy of Nepal: national publishing house Dehli, 1973.

Publication types

MeSH terms