Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;4(6):83-94.
doi: 10.18001/TRS.4.6.8.

Testing a Brief Web-based Intervention to Increase Recognition of Tobacco Constituents

Affiliations

Testing a Brief Web-based Intervention to Increase Recognition of Tobacco Constituents

Elizabeth G Klein et al. Tob Regul Sci. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: We examined website formats to increase smokers' recognition of harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) in cigarettes.

Methods: Adult, daily smokers (N = 279) were randomized to view a brief, single-page study website showing HPHC names and uses. The intervention site was tailored + interactive, labeled by cigarette brand/subbrand showing color imagery and pop-up boxes; the generic + static website (control) was unbranded in greyscale. Eye tracking equipment measured attention (dwell time) to precise website features. Linear regression analyses compared attention to HPHC descriptions and the correct recognition of 15 HPHC chemicals. A randomly selected sub-sample (N = 30) of participants qualitatively rated website usability.

Results: Despite spending less dwell time on the HPHC text and entire website, adult smokers who viewed the generic + static website had greater improvement in HPHC recognition compared to the tailored + interactive website (4.6 vs 3.6; p = .02); this finding contrasts with current literature on tailoring and interactivity. Both websites were rated highly on ease-of-use and readability.

Conclusions: Basic formats and narrative HPHC Web-based content attracted less visual attention, yet increased recognition of these chemicals in cigarettes, compared to brand-tailored, interactive web-based content.

Keywords: HPHCs; cigarettes; communication; constituents; ingredients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement All authors of this article declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screen Capture of Experimental Study Websites with Areas of Interest (AOI)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cummings KM, Hyland A, Giovino GA, et al. Are smokers adequately informed about the health risks of smoking and medicinal nicotine? Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(Suppl 3):S333–S340. - PubMed
    1. Hall MG, Ribisl KM, Brewer NT. Smokers’ and non-smokers’ beliefs about harmful tobacco constituents: implications for FDA communication efforts. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(3):343–350. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siahpush M, McNeill A, Hammond D, Fong GT. Socioeconomic and country variations in knowledge of health risks of tobacco smoking and toxic constituents of smoke: results from the 2002 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15(Suppl 3):iii65–iii70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Fava JL, et al. Smoking cessation and stress management: applications of the transtheoretical model. Homeostasis. 1998;38:216–233.
    1. Byron MJ, Lazard AJ, Peters E, et al. Effective formats for communicating risks from cigarette smoke chemicals. Tob Regul Sci. 2018;4(2):16–29. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources