A Japanese nationwide survey on the cryopreservation of embryos, oocytes and ovarian tissue for cancer patients
- PMID: 31364239
- DOI: 10.1111/jog.14073
A Japanese nationwide survey on the cryopreservation of embryos, oocytes and ovarian tissue for cancer patients
Abstract
Aim: The survival rates of cancer patients have greatly improved owing to the advances in oncology. The preservation of fertility in cancer patients is an important task. To determine the reality of cryopreservation of embryos, oocytes and ovarian tissue in cancer patients, large-scale survey analysis was performed in Japan.
Methods: We sent 613 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology-certified assisted reproductive technology institutions a questionnaire about their experience of performing cryopreservation for cancer patients between January 2011 and December 2015. Subsequently, the institutions that conducted cryopreservation for cancer patients were sent a second questionnaire.
Results: We received replies from 481 (78.5%) institutions. Among them, 126 (26.2%) conducted cryopreservation for cancer patients. These 126 institutions were sent a second questionnaire. Of these, 108 (85.7%) institutions responded. At the 108 institutions, 1085 embryo or oocyte cryopreservation procedures and 122 ovarian tissue cryopreservation procedures were conducted for cancer patients. Cryopreservation was mainly performed for breast cancer patients (~70%), followed by patients with hematological malignancy. A total of 361 and 19 embryo transfer cycles were performed for patients whose embryos and oocytes were cryopreserved, respectively, and 42 and seven institutions reported pregnancy outcomes after embryo transfer in patients that underwent embryo and oocyte cryopreservation, respectively. However, pregnancy was not observed in the seven cases that underwent ovarian tissue transfer.
Conclusion: Indications, age limits and ovarian stimulation protocols for cryopreservation widely varied between the institutions. A national registration system for oncofertility must be established to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the current system.
Keywords: assisted reproductive technology; breast cancer; controlled ovarian stimulation; cryopreservation; oncofertility.
© 2019 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Similar articles
-
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger increases the number of oocytes and embryos available for cryopreservation in cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation.Fertil Steril. 2017 Sep;108(3):532-538. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.027. Fertil Steril. 2017. PMID: 28865552
-
Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response.Hum Reprod. 2018 Nov 1;33(11):2051-2059. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew158. Hum Reprod. 2018. PMID: 27370358
-
Survey on the implementation status and reproductive outcomes of oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in Japan: Historical comparison with nationwide surveys.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Apr;50(4):709-718. doi: 10.1111/jog.15893. Epub 2024 Jan 23. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024. PMID: 38263596
-
A comparison of fertility preservation outcomes in patients who froze oocytes, embryos, or ovarian tissue for medically indicated circumstances: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Fertil Steril. 2022 Jun;117(6):1266-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Apr 19. Fertil Steril. 2022. PMID: 35459522
-
[Oncofertility and breast cancer].Bull Cancer. 2019 Dec;106(12S1):S43-S52. doi: 10.1016/S0007-4551(20)30047-3. Bull Cancer. 2019. PMID: 32008738 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Downregulation of hTERT contributes to ovarian cancer apoptosis and inhibits proliferation of ovarian cancer cells.Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Mar;9(3):1448-1454. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.01.39. Transl Cancer Res. 2020. PMID: 35117492 Free PMC article.
-
Methods of Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation: Is Vitrification Superior to Slow Freezing?-Ovarian Tissue Freezing Methods.Reprod Sci. 2021 Dec;28(12):3291-3302. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00591-6. Epub 2021 May 3. Reprod Sci. 2021. PMID: 33939167 Review.
-
Recent advances: fertility preservation and fertility restoration options for males and females.Fac Rev. 2021 Jun 10;10:55. doi: 10.12703/r/10-55. eCollection 2021. Fac Rev. 2021. PMID: 34195694 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison between two cryopreservation techniques of human ovarian cortex: morphological aspects and the heat shock response (HSR).Cell Stress Chaperones. 2021 Mar;27(2):97-106. doi: 10.1007/s12192-022-01252-6. Epub 2022 Jan 18. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2021. PMID: 35043289 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive outcomes of embryo cryopreservation and transfer at the start-up phase of fertility preservation in Japan.Reprod Med Biol. 2024 Jun 19;23(1):e12581. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12581. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Reprod Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 38899000 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Smith JR, Boyle DC, Corless DJ et al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: A new surgical technique for the conservative management of cervical carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1196-1200.
-
- Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Suzuki S et al. Fertility-sparing surgery in young women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010; 36: 404-408.
-
- Satoh T, Hatae M, Watanabe Y et al. Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A proposal for patient selection. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1727-1732.
-
- Harada M, Osuga Y. Fertility preservation for female cancer patients. Int J Clin Oncol 2018; 24: 28-33.
-
- Cakmak H, Rosen MP. Ovarian stimulation in cancer patients. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 1476-1484.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources