Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;45(10):2021-2028.
doi: 10.1111/jog.14073. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

A Japanese nationwide survey on the cryopreservation of embryos, oocytes and ovarian tissue for cancer patients

Affiliations

A Japanese nationwide survey on the cryopreservation of embryos, oocytes and ovarian tissue for cancer patients

Yuko Sanada et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Aim: The survival rates of cancer patients have greatly improved owing to the advances in oncology. The preservation of fertility in cancer patients is an important task. To determine the reality of cryopreservation of embryos, oocytes and ovarian tissue in cancer patients, large-scale survey analysis was performed in Japan.

Methods: We sent 613 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology-certified assisted reproductive technology institutions a questionnaire about their experience of performing cryopreservation for cancer patients between January 2011 and December 2015. Subsequently, the institutions that conducted cryopreservation for cancer patients were sent a second questionnaire.

Results: We received replies from 481 (78.5%) institutions. Among them, 126 (26.2%) conducted cryopreservation for cancer patients. These 126 institutions were sent a second questionnaire. Of these, 108 (85.7%) institutions responded. At the 108 institutions, 1085 embryo or oocyte cryopreservation procedures and 122 ovarian tissue cryopreservation procedures were conducted for cancer patients. Cryopreservation was mainly performed for breast cancer patients (~70%), followed by patients with hematological malignancy. A total of 361 and 19 embryo transfer cycles were performed for patients whose embryos and oocytes were cryopreserved, respectively, and 42 and seven institutions reported pregnancy outcomes after embryo transfer in patients that underwent embryo and oocyte cryopreservation, respectively. However, pregnancy was not observed in the seven cases that underwent ovarian tissue transfer.

Conclusion: Indications, age limits and ovarian stimulation protocols for cryopreservation widely varied between the institutions. A national registration system for oncofertility must be established to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the current system.

Keywords: assisted reproductive technology; breast cancer; controlled ovarian stimulation; cryopreservation; oncofertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith JR, Boyle DC, Corless DJ et al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: A new surgical technique for the conservative management of cervical carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1196-1200.
    1. Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Suzuki S et al. Fertility-sparing surgery in young women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010; 36: 404-408.
    1. Satoh T, Hatae M, Watanabe Y et al. Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A proposal for patient selection. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1727-1732.
    1. Harada M, Osuga Y. Fertility preservation for female cancer patients. Int J Clin Oncol 2018; 24: 28-33.
    1. Cakmak H, Rosen MP. Ovarian stimulation in cancer patients. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 1476-1484.