Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec;128(12):1141-1146.
doi: 10.1177/0003489419865562. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

Clinical Approach After Complicated Ear Mold Fitting: A Case Series of Six Patients and Evaluation of Literature

Affiliations
Review

Clinical Approach After Complicated Ear Mold Fitting: A Case Series of Six Patients and Evaluation of Literature

Cindy van den Boer et al. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Insertion of mold material into the middle ear is a complication of molding procedure for ear impression. These cases are referred to an ENT specialist. There is no standardized approach to this problem. Literature shows different clinical strategies. The aim of this study is to share our experience and to analyze the adverse outcome of different clinical approaches.

Methods: A case series of six patients with molding material inside the middle ear after complicated molding procedure for swimming earplugs are described. Additionally, available literature was reviewed to analyze results of the clinical approach after iatrogenic molding procedures. Forty-nine ears were included.

Results: In-office removal of the material is associated with a significant risk of adverse outcome if the eardrum cannot be examined. This also accounts for ossicular involvement.

Conclusions: Temporal bone CT is advised in patients after complicated ear mold fitting if the tympanic membrane cannot be examined completely or the middle ear is involved. Blind removal should be avoided. Retroauricular transcanal tympanotomy or transmastoidal tympanotomy with facial recess approach is best practice in case the mold material has entered the middle ear. A clinical treatment algorithm is presented.

Keywords: ear mold impression material; hearing aids; middle ear; middle ear foreign body; otologic surgical procedures; otology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Intraoperative view of canal wall up approach of mold material in the middle ear, epitympanum, and antrum. A wide canal plasty has been performed for improved middle ear exposure. The chain is intact, however covered with material.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Flowchart of clinical approach of attending outpatient ENT patient with ear mold material left in the ear canal. Abbreviation: EAC, external auricular canal.

References

    1. Moualed D, Masterson L, Kumar S, Donnelly N. Water precautions for prevention of infection in children with ventilation tubes (grommets). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;1:CD010375. - PMC - PubMed
    1. British Society of Audiology. Recommended practice for taking aural impression. https://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Impression-Taking-1.... Accessed February 2013.
    1. British Society of Audiology, Professional Practice Committee. Aural care delivered by hearing health care professionals: minimum training requirements. https://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Aural-Care-Minimum-.... Accessed March 2012.
    1. Jacob A, Morris TJ, Welling DB. Leaving a lasting impression: ear mold impressions as middle ear foreign bodies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115(12):912-916. - PubMed
    1. Verdam F, Tange R, Thomeer H. Impression material in the external and middle ear: an overview of the literature and a stepwise approach for removal. J Int Adv Otol. 2016;12(3):345-352. - PubMed