Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jan:147:e229.
doi: 10.1017/S0950268819001201.

Symptom profiling for infectious intestinal disease (IID): a secondary data analysis of the IID2 study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Symptom profiling for infectious intestinal disease (IID): a secondary data analysis of the IID2 study

A L Donaldson et al. Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Less than half of stool samples from people symptomatic with infectious intestinal disease (IID) will identify a causative organism. A secondary data analysis was undertaken to explore whether symptomology alone could be used to make inferences about causative organisms. Data were utilised from the Second Study of Infectious Intestinal Disease in the Community. A total of 844 cases were analysed. Few symptoms differentiated individual pathogens, but grouping pathogens together showed that viral IID was more likely when symptom onset was in winter (odds ratio (OR) 2.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-3.75) or spring (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.11-3.33), the patient was aged under 5 years (OR 3.63, 95% CI 2.24-6.03) and there was loss of appetite (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.29-3.72). The odds of bacterial IID were higher with diarrhoea in the absence of vomiting (OR 3.54, 95% CI 2.37-5.32), diarrhoea which persisted for >3 days (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.82-3.99), bloody diarrhoea (OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.63-11.83) and fever (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.11-2.53). Symptom profiles could be of value to help guide clinicians and public health professionals in the management of IID, in the absence of microbiological confirmation.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Gastroenteritis; Infectious intestinal disease; Surveillance; Symptomology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tam CC et al. (2012) The second study of infectious intestinal disease in the community (IID2 study). UK Food Standards Agency; project no B18021.
    1. Wall PG, et al. (1996) Food poisoning: notifications, laboratory reports, and outbreaks – where do the statistics come from and what do they mean? Communicable disease report. CDR review 6, R93–100. - PubMed
    1. Elliot AJ, et al. (2013) Syndromic surveillance – a public health legacy of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Public Health 127, 777–781. - PubMed
    1. UK Food Standards Agency (2000) A Report of the Study of Infectious Intestinal Disease in England. London: Stationery Office.
    1. De Wit MA, et al. (2001) Sensor, a population-based cohort study on gastroenteritis in the Netherlands: incidence and etiology. American Journal of Epidemiology 154, 666–674. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms