Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e198116.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8116.

Assessment of Therapeutic Interventions and Lung Protective Ventilation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Affiliations

Assessment of Therapeutic Interventions and Lung Protective Ventilation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Hiroko Aoyama et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: A number of interventions are available to manage patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the associations of currently available ventilatory strategies and adjunctive therapies with mortality are uncertain.

Objectives: To compare and rank different therapeutic strategies to identify the best intervention associated with a reduction in mortality in adult patients with moderate to severe ARDS.

Data sources: An electronic search of MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process/ePubs Ahead of Print, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trial Register (Central), PubMed, and CINAHL was conducted, from database inception to May 29, 2019.

Study selection: Randomized clinical trials of interventions for adults with moderate to severe ARDS that used lung protective ventilation. No language restrictions were applied.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were independently extracted by 2 reviewers and synthesized with Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Barotrauma was a secondary outcome.

Results: Among 25 randomized clinical trials evaluating 9 interventions, 2686 of 7743 patients (34.6%) died within 28 days. Compared with lung protective ventilation alone, prone positioning and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were associated with significantly lower 28-day mortality (prone positioning: risk ratio, 0.69; 95% credible interval, 0.48-0.99; low quality of evidence; venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: risk ratio, 0.60; 95% credible interval, 0.38-0.93; moderate quality of evidence). These 2 interventions had the highest ranking probabilities, although they were not significantly different from each other. Among 18 trials reporting on barotrauma, 448 of 6258 patients (7.2%) experienced this secondary outcome. No intervention was superior to any other in reducing barotrauma, and each represented low to very low quality of evidence.

Conclusions and relevance: This network meta-analysis supports the use of prone positioning and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in addition to lung protective ventilation in patients with ARDS. Moreover, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be considered as an early strategy for adults with severe ARDS receiving lung protective ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Uchida reported receiving grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and a collaborative research agreement with Nihon Kohden Cooperation outside the submitted work. Dr Fan reported receiving personal fees from MC3 Cardiopulmonary and personal fees from ALung Technologies outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. PRISMA Flow Diagram
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Network Geometry and Ranking Probabilities for the Association of Interventions With Outcomes
Network geometry shows the interventions as nodes and the direct comparisons as connections between the nodes. Larger node size indicates a larger total number of participants in arms including that intervention, and thicker connection indicates a larger number of trials investigating that comparison. HFOV indicates high-frequency oscillatory ventilation; INO, inhaled nitric oxide; LPV, lung protective ventilation; NMBA, neuromuscular blockade; RM, recruitment maneuver; and VV ECMO, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. aOpen lung strategy using RM and/or higher positive end-expiratory pressure.

References

    1. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. ; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group . Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):-. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0291 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashbaugh DG, Bigelow DB, Petty TL, Levine BE. Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet. 1967;2(7511):319-323. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90168-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fan E, Brodie D, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA. 2018;319(7):698-710. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.21907 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thompson BT, Chambers RC, Liu KD. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(6):562-572. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1608077 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2126-2136. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1208707 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding