Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of articaine in irreversible pulpitis of the mandibular molar: A randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 31365529
- PMCID: PMC6668778
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219536
Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of articaine in irreversible pulpitis of the mandibular molar: A randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of two volumes of articaine in conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) of mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis, and in cases of anesthetic failure, its complementation with periodontal ligament injection (PDL).
Methods: Ninety patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars received conventional IANB with 1.8 mL or 3.6 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. In cases of IANB failure, the same volumes were administered in the PDL. Presence of pulpal anesthesia and absence/presence of pain during pulpectomy were evaluated by electric pulp stimulation and verbal analogue scale, respectively. Relative risks (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for each outcome.
Results: 27% and 42% of the patients achieved pulpal anesthesia following IANB with 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL, respectively (RR = 0.63, CI 95% 0.35 to 1.14, p = 0.12). Analgesia during pulpectomy was present in 64% and 73% of the patients, respectively, for 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL (RR = 0.87, CI 95% 0.66 to 1.16, p = 0.36). In cases of IANB failure, 75% and 42% of the patients that received 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of PDL injection, respectively, achieved pulpal anesthesia (RR = 1.80, CI 95% 0.87 to 3.72, p = 0.11). During a new attempt at the pulpectomy procedure, analgesia was present in 69% and 75% of the patients, respectively, for 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL (RR = 0.91, CI 95% 0.57 to 1.45, p = 0.71).
Conclusion: Increasing the volume from 1.8 mL to 3.6 mL of the 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in the IANB and in the PDL, did not significantly increase the success rate of pulpal anesthesia and clinical analgesia during the pulpectomy procedure. Therefore, both volumes presented a similar efficacy, though neither resulted in effective pain control during irreversible pulpitis treatment.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02422823.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal infiltration or periodontal ligament injections with articaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis in the mandibular first molar.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Nov;108(5):e89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.06.012. Epub 2009 Sep 12. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009. PMID: 19748293 Clinical Trial.
-
The efficacy of supplemental intraseptal and buccal infiltration anesthesia in mandibular molars of patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Mar;24(3):1281-1286. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03006-8. Epub 2019 Jul 13. Clin Oral Investig. 2020. PMID: 31302768 Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth.J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):421-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Feb 2. J Endod. 2012. PMID: 22414822 Clinical Trial.
-
Articaine buccal infiltration for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: is it as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine? a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Feb 21;29(3):146. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06229-0. Clin Oral Investig. 2025. PMID: 39982504
-
EFFICACY OF 4% ARTICAINE BUCCAL INFILTRATION VERSUS INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE BLOCK FOR MANDIBULAR MOLARS WITH SYMPTOMATIC IRREVERSIBLE PULPITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022 Jun;22(2):101712. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101712. Epub 2022 Mar 6. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022. PMID: 35718426
Cited by
-
Articaine Versus Mepivacaine in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Patients With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Cureus. 2024 Nov 9;16(11):e73360. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73360. eCollection 2024 Nov. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39524167 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison between the Flapless Surgical Approach and a Novel Single Incision Access in Terms of Recovery Time and Comfort after Extraction of Impacted Inferior Third Molars: A Randomised, Blinded, Split-Mouth Controlled Clinical Trial.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 2;12(5):1995. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051995. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902781 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Articaine brands: A randomized non-inferiority controlled trial.Heliyon. 2021 Jun 9;7(6):e07252. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07252. eCollection 2021 Jun. Heliyon. 2021. PMID: 34195402 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of cigarette smoking on the efficiency of local anesthesia during simple tooth extraction.Saudi Dent J. 2021 Nov;33(7):674-678. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.011. Epub 2020 May 7. Saudi Dent J. 2021. PMID: 34803318 Free PMC article.
-
Flapless Surgical Approach to Extract Impacted Inferior Third Molars: A Retrospective Clinical Study.J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 4;10(4):593. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040593. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33557388 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical