Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 7;6(3):733-739.
doi: 10.1002/nop2.275. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology

Annelie J Sundler  1 , Elisabeth Lindberg  1 , Christina Nilsson  1 , Lina Palmér  1
Affiliations

Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology

Annelie J Sundler et al. Nurs Open. .

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this paper was to discuss how to understand and undertake thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Methodological principles to guide the process of analysis are offered grounded on phenomenological philosophy. This is further discussed in relation to how scientific rigour and validity can be achieved.

Design: This is a discursive article on thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology.

Results: This paper takes thematic analysis based on a descriptive phenomenological tradition forward and provides a useful description on how to undertake the analysis. Ontological and epistemological foundations of descriptive phenomenology are outlined. Methodological principles are explained to guide the process of analysis, as well as help to understand validity and rigour. Researchers and students in nursing and midwifery conducting qualitative research need comprehensible and valid methods to analyse the meaning of lived experiences and organize data in meaningful ways.

Keywords: healthcare research; lifeworld; lived experiences; meanings; midwifery; nursing; phenomenology; qualitative; thematic analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of thematic analysis
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of questions useful to the uphold reflexivity, credibility and transferability of the research process in the thematic analysis of meanings
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Braun, V. , & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
    1. Cypress, B. S. (2017). Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: Perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization and recommendations. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 36(4), 253–263. 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000253 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dahlberg, H. , & Dahlberg, K. (2003). To not make definite what is indefinite: A phenomenological analysis of perception and its epistemological consequences. Journal of the Humanistic Psychologist, 31(4), 34–50.
    1. Dahlberg, K. , Dahlberg, H. , & Nyström, M. (2008). Reflective lifeworld research. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
    1. Dowling, M. (2007). From Husserl to van Manen: A review of different phenomenological approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(1), 131–142. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.026 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources