Evidence for Residual Immunity to Smallpox After Vaccination and Implications for Re-emergence
- PMID: 31369103
- DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usz181
Evidence for Residual Immunity to Smallpox After Vaccination and Implications for Re-emergence
Abstract
Introduction: Smallpox has been eradicated but advances in synthetic biology have increased the risk of its re-emergence. Residual immunity in individuals who were previously vaccinated may mitigate the impact of an outbreak, but there is a high degree of uncertainty about the duration and degree of residual immunity. Both cell-mediated and humoral immunity are thought to be important but the exact mechanisms of protection are unclear. Guidelines usually suggest vaccine-induced immunity wanes to zero after 3-10 years post vaccination, whereas other estimates show long term immunity over decades.
Materials and methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to quantify the duration and extent of residual immunity to smallpox after vaccination.
Results: Twenty-nine papers related to quantifying residual immunity to smallpox after vaccination were identified: neutralizing antibody levels were used as immune correlates of protection in 11/16 retrospective cross-sectional studies, 2/3 epidemiological studies, 6/7 prospective vaccine trials and 0/3 modeling studies. Duration of protection of >20 years was consistently shown in the 16 retrospective cross-sectional studies, while the lowest estimated duration of protection was 11.7 years among the modeling studies. Childhood vaccination conferred longer duration of protection than vaccination in adulthood, and multiple vaccinations did not appear to improve immunity.
Conclusions: Most studies suggest a longer duration of residual immunity (at least 20 years) than assumed in smallpox guidelines. Estimates from modeling studies were less but still greater than the 3-10 years suggested by the WHO Committee on International Quarantine or US CDC guidelines. These recommendations were probably based on observations and studies conducted while smallpox was endemic. The cut-off values for pre-existing antibody levels of >1:20 and >1:32 reported during the period of endemic smallpox circulation may not be relevant to the contemporary population, but have been used as a threshold for identifying people with residual immunity in post-eradication era studies. Of the total antibodies produced in response to smallpox vaccination, neutralizing antibodies have shown to contribute significantly to immunological memory. Although the mechanism of immunological memory and boosting is unclear, revaccination is likely to result in a more robust response. There is a need to improve the evidence base for estimates on residual immunity to better inform planning and preparedness for re-emergent smallpox.
Keywords: Smallpox; residual immunity; vaccine; variola virus.
© Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Serological Immunity to Smallpox in New South Wales, Australia.Viruses. 2020 May 18;12(5):554. doi: 10.3390/v12050554. Viruses. 2020. PMID: 32443405 Free PMC article.
-
How Valid Are Assumptions About Re-emerging Smallpox? A Systematic Review of Parameters Used in Smallpox Mathematical Models.Mil Med. 2018 Jul 1;183(7-8):e200-e207. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx092. Mil Med. 2018. PMID: 29425329
-
Antiviral immunity following smallpox virus infection: a case-control study.J Virol. 2010 Dec;84(24):12754-60. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01763-10. Epub 2010 Oct 6. J Virol. 2010. PMID: 20926574 Free PMC article.
-
Recommendations for using smallpox vaccine in a pre-event vaccination program. Supplemental recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC).MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003 Apr 4;52(RR-7):1-16. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003. PMID: 12710832
-
Duration of immunity after smallpox vaccination: a study on vaccination policy against smallpox bioterrorism in Japan.Jpn J Infect Dis. 2002 Aug;55(4):112-6. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2002. PMID: 12403907 Review.
Cited by
-
[Mpox in humans: an overview of the 2022-2023 epidemic].Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Mar 4;62(2):1-9. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10713144. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024. PMID: 39514866 Free PMC article. Review. Spanish.
-
Preventing the Next Pandemic: Is Live Vaccine Efficacious against Monkeypox, or Is There a Need for Killed Virus and mRNA Vaccines?Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Aug 29;10(9):1419. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10091419. Vaccines (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36146497 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predicting vaccine effectiveness for mpox.Nat Commun. 2024 May 8;15(1):3856. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48180-w. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38719852 Free PMC article.
-
Bartonella infections are prevalent in rodents despite efficient immune responses.Parasit Vectors. 2023 Sep 4;16(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05918-7. Parasit Vectors. 2023. PMID: 37667323 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of historical smallpox vaccination against mpox clade II in men in Denmark, France, the Netherlands and Spain, 2022.Euro Surveill. 2024 Aug;29(34):2400139. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.34.2400139. Euro Surveill. 2024. PMID: 39176988 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical