Interobserver agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 lexicon among radiologists with different levels of experience
- PMID: 31369194
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26882
Interobserver agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 lexicon among radiologists with different levels of experience
Abstract
Background: Evaluation of interobserver agreement of the PI-RADS v2 lexicon is important to validate the uniformity of this widely used classification.
Purpose: To determine the interobserver agreement of PI-RADS v2 lexicon among eight radiologists with varying levels of experience.
Study type: Retrospective.
Population: In all, 160 consecutively imaged men with confirmatory targeted biopsy.
Field strength/sequence: 3T scanner without an endorectal coil. T2 -weighted imaging (T2 w), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence were performed.
Assessment: Eight radiologists (two highly experienced, two moderately experienced, and four less experienced) independently read 130 lesions in the peripheral zone (PZ) and 30 lesions in the transition zone (TZ), blinded to clinical MRI indication and biopsy results. The features described in PI-RADS v2 for TZ and PZ lesions were evaluated.
Statistical tests: Conger's kappa, percentage of concordance, and first-order agreement coefficient (AC1) were used to evaluate interobserver agreement.
Results: From the features evaluated on PZ lesions, definite extraprostatic extension (EPE) / invasive behavior on T2 w had good agreement (AC1 = 0.80), and the others had fair agreement (AC1 = 0.32-0.40). From the features evaluated on TZ lesions, two had good agreement: definite EPE/invasive behavior (AC1 = 0.77) and moderate/marked hypointensity (AC1 = 0.67) on T2 w. Encapsulation and lenticular shape on T2 w, focal (not indistinct) on DWI and ADC map, and marked hypointensity on ADC map (AC1 = 0.45 to 0.60) had moderate agreement, whereas heterogeneous and circumscribed (not obscured margins) on T2 w, marked hyperintensity on high-b-value DWI, and the presence or not of early enhancement in the lesion/region of the lesion (AC1 = 0.30 to 0.38) had fair agreement.
Data conclusion: Interobserver agreement in PI-RADS v2 lexicon ranges from fair to good among radiologists and improves with increasing experience.
Level of evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:593-602.
Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging; neoplasms; prostate.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
References
-
- Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012;22:746-757.
-
- Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol 2016;69:16-40.
-
- Vargas HA, Hötker AM, Goldman DA, et al. Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: Critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol 2016;26:1606-1612.
-
- Greer MD, Shih JH, Lay N, et al. Validation of the dominant sequence paradigm and role of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging in PI-RADS Version 2. Radiology 2017;285:859-869.
-
- Rosenkrantz AB, Ginocchio LA, Cornfeld D, et al. Interobserver reproducibility of the PI-RADS Version 2 Lexicon: A multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology 2016;280:793-804.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous