Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;100(5):413-419.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.142. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

Changes in US health care provider attitudes related to contraceptive safety before and after the release of National Guidance

Lauren B Zapata  1 , Isabel A Morgan  2 , Kathryn M Curtis  3 , Suzanne G Folger  3 , Maura K Whiteman  3
Affiliations

Changes in US health care provider attitudes related to contraceptive safety before and after the release of National Guidance

Lauren B Zapata et al. Contraception. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: The US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (USMEC) is the first national guidance containing evidence-based recommendations for contraception. We describe provider attitudes about contraceptive safety before and after the 2010 USMEC release.

Study design: We conducted two cross-sectional mailed surveys using different nationwide samples of office-based physicians and Title X clinic providers before (2009-2010) and after (2013-2014) the USMEC release. We compared the proportion of providers reporting select contraceptive methods as safe for women with specific characteristics or medical conditions before and after the USMEC release and conducted multivariable logistic regression to adjust for provider characteristics.

Results: For the following select characteristics for which the USMEC classifies specific contraceptive methods as safe (Category 1 or 2), a significantly (p<.05) higher proportion of providers reported the method safe after versus before the USMEC release: intrauterine devices (IUDs) for adolescents (79.8% versus 60.2%), IUDs for women with HIV (72.4% versus 50.6%), depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) for women with obesity (89.5% versus 76.1%), and DMPA for women with history of bariatric surgery (87.6% versus 73.9%). These differences remained significant after adjustment for provider characteristics.

Conclusions: While we observed many positive changes in health care provider attitudes related to contraception safety after the USMEC release, gaps remain. Continuing education and evidence-based training for providers, and ensuring office and health center protocols address medical eligibility for contraception for the full range of characteristics included in the USMEC might bridge remaining gaps and increase delivery of high-quality contraception care.

Implications: Gaps between evidence and provider attitudes remain that can inform future efforts to improve contraceptive service delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. N Engl J Med 2016;374:843–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gipson JD, Koenig MA, Hindin MJ. The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 2008;39:18–38. - PubMed
    1. Sonfield A, Kost K, Gold RB, Finer LB. The public costs of births resulting from unintended pregnancies: national and state-level estimates. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2011;43:94–102. - PubMed
    1. U S CDC. Medical Eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. MMWR Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report Recommendations and reports 2010;59:1–86. - PubMed
    1. Medical Eligibility WHO. Criteria for contraceptive use: A WHO family planning cornerstone. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances