Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;106(3):525-562.
doi: 10.1257/aer.20130626.

University Differences in the Graduation of Minorities in STEM Fields: Evidence from California

Affiliations

University Differences in the Graduation of Minorities in STEM Fields: Evidence from California

Peter Arcidiacono et al. Am Econ Rev. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

We examine differences in minority science graduation rates among University of California campuses when racial preferences were in place. Less prepared minorities at higher ranked campuses had lower persistence rates in science and took longer to graduate. We estimate a model of students' college major choice where net returns of a science major differ across campuses and student preparation. We find less prepared minority students at top ranked campuses would have higher science graduation rates had they attended lower ranked campuses. Better matching of science students to universities by preparation and providing information about students' prospects in different major-university combinations could increase minority science graduation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of Preparation Score (S) for Applicants to UC Berkeley by Minority and Accept/Reject Status Note: See footnote for a definition of the preparation score, S. Source: UCOP, years 1995–1997
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Distribution of Preparation Scores for Minority UC Berkeley Admits and Nonminority UC Applicants Note: See footnote for a definition of the preparation score, S. Source: UCOP, years 1995–1997
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Differences in Net Returns to Student Academic Preparation (AI) by Major at Selective (A) and Nonselective (B) Colleges
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Differences in Net Returns to Students’ Standardized Academic Preparation Index (AIij*) by Major at Different UC Campuses

References

    1. Altonji Joseph G., Blom Erica, and Meghir Costas. 2012. “Heterogeneity in Human Capital Investments: High School Curriculum, College Major, and Careers.” Annual Review of Economics 4: 185–223.
    1. Alvarez Lizette. 2012. “Florida May Reduce Tuition for Select Majors” New York Times; December 9, 2012.
    1. Anderson Eugene, and Kim Dongbin. 2006. “Increasing the Success of Minority Students in Science and Technology” Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
    1. Antonovics Kate, and Backes Ben. 2014a. “The Effect of Banning Affirmative Action on College Admissions Policies and Student Quality.” Journal of Human Resources 49 (2): 295–322.
    1. Antonovics Kate, and Backes Ben. 2014b. “The Effect of Banning Affirmative Action on Human Capital Accumulation Prior to College Entry.” IZA Journal of Labor Economics 3 (5).

LinkOut - more resources