Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;37(3):242-249.
doi: 10.2337/cd18-0082.

Implementation of A1C Point-of-Care Testing: Serving Under-Resourced Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in a Public Health Department

Affiliations

Implementation of A1C Point-of-Care Testing: Serving Under-Resourced Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in a Public Health Department

Mary Nicole John et al. Clin Diabetes. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

IN BRIEF A1C point-of-care testing (POCT) paired with face-to-face education potentially improves glycemic control in under-resourced populations. In this study, A1C POCT was implemented with same-day face-to-face medication management and education for adults with type 2 diabetes in a public health department in southeastern North Carolina. The combination of POCT, medication management, and education provided together improved glycemic control and decreased clinical inertia in a setting in which access to health care is limited.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Progression of conveniently sampled participants from baseline through PI1 and final sample (PI2) that progressed through all time points.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Percentage of participants with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, microalbuminuria, nicotine dependence, chronic kidney disease, and/or heart disease for patients with an A1C >7% and a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes at baseline. CKD I-III, chronic kidney disease stages 1–3; smoking status, current smoker.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Classes of medications used (started/increased) by patients who received A1C POCT and had an A1C >7% at all time points. GLP-1s, GLP-1 receptor agonists.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
A one-way repeated ANOVA was used to compare the mean A1C for all patients with an A1C >7% before implementation of A1C POCT (baseline), at the initial A1C POCT (PI1), and at the 3-month follow-up A1C POCT (PI2). A significant increase in A1C was seen from baseline to PI1 (P = 0.008), and a significant decrease in A1C was seen from PI1 to PI2 (P = 0.008).
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
χ2 Test used to analyze pattern of medication intensification for the implementation group at baseline, PI1, and PI2. Significant increases in medication intensification were found from baseline to PI1 and from baseline to PI2, P = 0.008 and P <0.001, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2017. Available from www.diabetes.org/assets/pdfs/basics/cdc-statistics-report-2017.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2017
    1. Marmot M. Addressing social determinants of health in primary care. American Academy of Family Physicians; 2018. Available from www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/patient_care/everyone_project/team-based.... Accessed 7 April 2018
    1. Walker RJ, Smalls BL, Campbell JA, Williams JLS, Egede LE. Impact of social determinants of health on outcomes for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Endocrine 2014;47:29–48 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Diagnosed diabetes, age-adjusted percentage, adults with diabetes, total, 2015. Available from gis.cdc.gov/grasp/diabetes/DiabetesAtlas.html. Accessed 5 December 2016
    1. North Carolina Diabetes Advisory Council. Type 2 Diabetes in North Carolina factsheet. 2018. Available from www.diabetesnc.com/downloads/0518/DAC_FactSheet_Diabetes_May2018.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2018