Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;35(4):380-386.
doi: 10.6515/ACS.201907_35(4).20181126A.

Quantification of Stent Creep by Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Bioprostheses

Affiliations

Quantification of Stent Creep by Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Bioprostheses

Kuan-Chih Huang et al. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation (aVIV) has been used to treat bioprosthetic failure due to "stent creep", defined as inward flexion or bending of stent posts. The aim of this study was to develop quantitative three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) geometric analysis of failed bioprostheses to determine the incidence of stent creep in patients undergoing aVIV and its contribution to the hemodynamics of those valves.

Methods: We retrospectively examined the 3D-TEE of 22 consecutive patients (age 74.4 ± 11.3 years; M/F = 12/10) who underwent aVIV for failed bioprostheses. The modes of bioprosthesis failure included stenosis (n = 8), regurgitation (n = 9), and combined (n = 5). The degree of stent creep was assessed by calculating the triangular area obtained by projecting the apex of stent posts on a reconstructed plane. This measured area was divided by that of the regular triangle defined by the base of stent posts to calculate a ratio, which we termed the "stent creep ratio" (SCR).

Results: The mean SCR was lower in the patients with failed prostheses than that in the controls (0.82 ± 0.16 vs. 0.96 ± 0.05, p = 0.02). The SCR was negatively correlated with the peak trans-aortic pressure gradient (r = -0.62, p < 0.01). An SCR cut-off point of 0.79 was associated with aortic peak velocity > 4 m/s (AUC = 0.81, sensitivity = 0.79, specificity = 0.83). Fourteen of the 22 patients had pre- and post-aVIV 3D-TEE, and the SCR was corrected satisfactorily from 0.81 ± 0.13 to 1.04 ± 0.19 (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: SCR measured by 3D-TEE is feasible to quantitatively evaluate stent creep. Stent creep is an important mode of structural deterioration in surgical bioprostheses, which can be treated by aVIV.

Keywords: Aortic valve-in-valve; Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction; Stent creep ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Calculation of stent creep ratio (SCR). (A) Ideally, three stent posts are perpendicular to the annular ring. As a results, the area of tip-triangle (blue) should equal the bottom-triangle (orange). Once stent creeping (SC) develops, tip-triangle shrinks and the ratio of tip- to bottom-triangle will be less than 1.0. (B) By three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multi-planar reconstruction technique, the three tips of stent posts could be identified. (c) A case of SC. The tip-triangle area is calculated as 0.82 cm2 by Heron’s formula. (D) Bottom triangle is calculated basing the inner diameter of 21 mm Edwards standard (CE-S) bioprosthesis. The SCR is 0.82/1.18 = 0.69.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predicting peak aortic pressure gradient > 4 m/s with SCR by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
SCR of 14 failed bioprostheses before and after aVIV.

Similar articles

References

    1. Schoen FJ, Schulman LJ, Cohn LH. Quantitative anatomic analysis of "stent creep" of explanted Hancock standard porcine bioprostheses used for cardiac valve replacement. Am J Cardiol. 1985;56:110–114. - PubMed
    1. Chen YH, Chang HH, Chen PL, et al. Procedural characteristics and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a single-center experience of the first 100 inoperable or high surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2017;33:339–349. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yin WH. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Taiwan: still evolving! Acta Cardiol Sin. 2017;33:350. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eggebrecht H, Schäfer U, Treede H, et al. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:1218–1227. - PubMed
    1. Gurvitch R, Cheung A, Ye J, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed surgical bioprosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2196–2209. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources